Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 26 of 26

Thread: compensating for a lack of back pressure

  1. #16
    Join Date
    19th November 2003 - 18:45
    Bike
    KTM 690 DUKE R
    Location
    Auckland - unavoidably...
    Posts
    6,422
    Quote Originally Posted by imdying
    That's not back pressure in either instance. And scavenging is as important on 4 strokes as it is on 2 strokes. A 2 strokes total exhaust length matters as much as does the header length on a 4 stroke.
    Sets up a kind of standing wave dont it? And when you hit the right frequencies, Ie the powerband, this standing wave is its most effective?

  2. #17
    Join Date
    23rd April 2004 - 19:16
    Bike
    2010 DC Skate Shoes
    Location
    Roxby Downs, SA
    Posts
    7,089
    the standing wave would be formed when the length of the pipe and length of the exhaust pulse 'wave' are equal in the sense that:

    exhaust length = X. pulse-wavelength
    where X is n =1,2,3....

    thats off the top of my head though, and assuming that its open at both ends? - i failed that paper. Thats where the grey area is for me, i dont know whether to take it as a closed end pipe, or open at both ends. Will have to check my notes to make sure which formula is for which, but hopefully the interweb will divulge some information as to which is best to use AND how the hell i figure out the length of the exhaust pulse waves.
    KiwiBitcher
    where opinion holds more weight than fact.

    It's better to not pass and know that you could have than to pass and find out that you can't. Wait for the straight.

  3. #18
    You should just put a gate valve on the end of your exhaust,then you can adjust it to the amount of back pressure required - there is always a simple (and cheap!!) answer...

  4. #19
    Join Date
    23rd April 2004 - 19:16
    Bike
    2010 DC Skate Shoes
    Location
    Roxby Downs, SA
    Posts
    7,089
    like a butterfly valve? or more like those things they have on the top of truck exhausts?
    KiwiBitcher
    where opinion holds more weight than fact.

    It's better to not pass and know that you could have than to pass and find out that you can't. Wait for the straight.

  5. #20
    Join Date
    17th February 2005 - 11:36
    Bike
    Bikes!
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    9,649
    Quote Originally Posted by sAsLEX
    Sets up a kind of standing wave dont it? And when you hit the right frequencies, Ie the powerband, this standing wave is its most effective?
    Most effective is a pretty loose term, which is why we have powervalves on strokers, and EXUP type valves on 4 strokes. There's an optimum tuning (length/diameter/whatever) for an exhaust pipe for a given set of engine conditions (throttle/load/revs/whatever), for every engine, that gives maximum torque. The cunning part of course is getting it all right... and of course once you've done that, you want to do the same with the intake (variable length/diameter runners).

  6. #21
    Join Date
    19th November 2003 - 18:45
    Bike
    KTM 690 DUKE R
    Location
    Auckland - unavoidably...
    Posts
    6,422
    Quote Originally Posted by imdying
    Most effective is a pretty loose term, which is why we have powervalves on strokers, and EXUP type valves on 4 strokes. There's an optimum tuning (length/diameter/whatever) for an exhaust pipe for a given set of engine conditions (throttle/load/revs/whatever), for every engine, that gives maximum torque. The cunning part of course is getting it all right... and of course once you've done that, you want to do the same with the intake (variable length/diameter runners).
    hmmm I see varying the intake length as not that great a challange as its low temp and you could make something that varied constantly without too much difficulty, most systems I have seen jsut use two different lengths though.

    The same with the exhaust most have two different configurations which they switch between. In a 4 stroke for example is the length that produces optimum at low revs compared to high very different? ie in the range of inches or feet?

  7. #22
    Join Date
    17th February 2005 - 11:36
    Bike
    Bikes!
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    9,649
    You would have to calculate that for a given application.

  8. #23
    Join Date
    19th November 2003 - 18:45
    Bike
    KTM 690 DUKE R
    Location
    Auckland - unavoidably...
    Posts
    6,422
    Quote Originally Posted by imdying
    You would have to calculate that for a given application.
    How did I know you would come back with that!


    ok roughly for a 800 cc V4 4 stroke at a rough guess ballpark kinda figure?

  9. #24
    Quote Originally Posted by sAsLEX
    The same with the exhaust most have two different configurations which they switch between. In a 4 stroke for example is the length that produces optimum at low revs compared to high very different? ie in the range of inches or feet?
    With the Rickman Metisse you see in my avatar I made a set of tuned length TT pipes,they come together under the engine and then splay out either side of the rear wheel.They made the motor really camy,with a big power kick at 4500 rpm,then out to 10,500 if I wanted too....and a ropey idle,a raspy noisy thing.Then I fitted gutted VW tail pipes on the end,you can see those by the rear wheel - with these in it didn't come ''on cam'',almost the same power but spread over the whole rev range,but less revs,a nice idle and deep mellow tone,I would pull out the tailpipes for go fast stuff.So - 150mm say to transform a screaming chainsaw into a mellow grunter.

  10. #25
    Join Date
    13th March 2003 - 11:47
    Bike
    2006 Honda XR250L
    Location
    Porirua
    Posts
    7,355
    Its the right length that counts.
    Cheers

    Merv

  11. #26
    Join Date
    17th February 2005 - 11:36
    Bike
    Bikes!
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    9,649
    Quote Originally Posted by sAsLEX
    How did I know you would come back with that!


    ok roughly for a 800 cc V4 4 stroke at a rough guess ballpark kinda figure?
    Because it's obvious how important it is! It would depend entirely on workable range of rpm desired. Everything is a compromise in engine design, you're trying to minimze them is all. On an 800cc road bike, an acceptable compromise might be a change in length of 6-12 inches.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •