Hillbilly, those are both watercooled examples so aren't eligible under NZ rules.
Yes I agree that a Water cooled 100 will ultimately be a better bike esp for longer tracks.
Aircooled bikes have to run richer & lower compression if they are to hope to keep producing power for a whole race. The more power you extract, the more you are likely to lose it as it gets too hot.
The 125s are self regulating in that matter, perhaps the bad gearboxes is another disadvantage. I know someone who was toying with a 125 twin as described, but didn’t proceed as the gearboxes are 5 speed & bad ratios. But the ruling could be 28mm on single cylinder air-cooled to quell that argument.
The idea that slamming a 28mm carb on a 125 would produce a monster is unlikely as really a hot 125 is quite restricted with a 28, as I said RS125s came with 39s in the early days. More telling is aircooled MX bikes ran 34s.
I think it would be easier to make a competitive 125 than the current situation, the two routes are build a hot water-cooled 100 which has the most potential, but by far the most work, or just go for a 150.
As for Joe he just made do with animal riding & a blind disobedience to obey the laws of physics.
Don't you look at my accountant.
He's the only one I've got.
Bookmarks