Snap election!

[Finn]

finn....why didn't you make the poll so you can see who voted....coz we can't lynch them for voting labour if we don't know who they are!!!!

Problem is if I made it public, no one would admit voting Labour. I've kept it real.

Oh and I donated $100 bucks to SpankMe in return for knowing who voted Labour. There's a few down your way so I'll be giving you their addresses shortly. So start saving up the cow shit.

[sels1]

I propose an extra box on the bottom of every voting form that says "None of the above". If that box gets the most ticks, those canditates get dismissed and a new bunch could apply. Eventually we might get some good ones.......

[Lias]

Civil Union is not just for gays...
More man-woman civil unions have prob taken place than same sex ones.

The existing de facto laws really covered that already, and I could have lived with those being extended to cover homosexuals. But marriage to me is a religious ceremony of declaring their love before their god(s), and I honestly think the way the civil unions thing was pushed through makes a mockery of it. I also think our divorce laws help make a mockery too.

Marriage (or anything like it) should be restricted to lifelong cimmitments between a man/woman of a religious nature, and defactor/common law status should be for all others. PS: I'm not a christian either.

[Squeak the Rat]

In April there had only been 178 male/male, 199 female/female and 81 male/female registrations for civil unions.

Worth every cent of the 3 months worth of debates in parliament.

[LilSel]

But marriage to me is a religious ceremony of declaring their love before their god(s), and I honestly think the way the civil unions thing was pushed through makes a mockery of it.

Each to their own...

Civil Union to me is a ceremony of two people declaring their love, regardless of sexuality.


~ Equality ~
The right of different groups of people to have a similar social position and receive the same treatment.

[kickingzebra]

Ha, thats hilarious!!
Happy middle ground? Don't kow that it can happen.
I would like to see adversarial system abolished, but the alternative leans too far to communism for my liking. How about we remove the vast majority of legal protections for public servants (the servant holds the whip and the purse strings, how the feck does that work?).
If they are legally held to account for their actions (not just the donnas that they want to kill off, but the helens for fraud/forgery, the winnies for wasting court time, etc etc.) May just cull some of the self serving politics, and bring people in who don't give a rats arse about the media, but want to see this country grow and prosper.

[The Pastor]

In April there had only been 178 male/male, 199 female/female and 81 male/female registrations for civil unions.

Worth every cent of the 3 months worth of debates in parliament.

Awesome, whats the wage for an average mp? 150k?


So an average mp gets 37.5 grand every 3 months.

Now how many mps are there in parlament? about 100? Thats 375 grand for 458 people or 0.01145% of the population, still thats about half of what LABOUR STOLE.

[bert_is_evil]

The existing de facto laws really covered that already, and I could have lived with those being extended to cover homosexuals. But marriage to me is a religious ceremony of declaring their love before their god(s), and I honestly think the way the civil unions thing was pushed through makes a mockery of it. I also think our divorce laws help make a mockery too.

Marriage (or anything like it) should be restricted to lifelong cimmitments between a man/woman of a religious nature, and defactor/common law status should be for all others. PS: I'm not a christian either.

You are quite incorrect sir - the existing de facto laws did not cover that already.

What do you mean by "of a religious nature" - christian? non christian? christian-like? jedi? should a hindu man and woman not be allowed to be legally married because they don't claim to worship "god"?

Your argument is contradictory. Most heterosexual couples that have chosen to civil union rather than marriage have done so on the basis that they are not religious, if civil union didn't exist they would be forced to marry, which you don't agree with because they are not religious (see the vicious circle).

[Finn]

The Civil Union bill guaranteed the gay vote. It was also another man hating bill providing another means of screwing over men who are suckered into a relationship with a piece of arse who dumps them in 3 years and strips them of assets.

Note: I have nothing against gay people. Dover's a good friend of mine and he assures me that he's not gay, but he has slept with a few guys that were.

[Finn]

NEWS FLASH!!! Sweden has seen the light - finally.

The left of leftist countries experimenting with social engineering have just changed governments. Welcome a centre right government.

The reasons for changing are;

Huge increase in violent crime
Failure of healthcare
Failure of education
Somalian refugees
Tax
And a shit load more

I'm sure this all sound familiar. I used to live in Sweden 15 years ago and have been back several times. The lefties have really done a good job stuffing the place up.

I mean how the fuck can you tax a country into prosperity?

[John Banks]

The existing de facto laws really covered that already, and I could have lived with those being extended to cover homosexuals. But marriage to me is a religious ceremony of declaring their love before their god(s), and I honestly think the way the civil unions thing was pushed through makes a mockery of it. I also think our divorce laws help make a mockery too.

Marriage (or anything like it) should be restricted to lifelong cimmitments between a man/woman of a religious nature, and defactor/common law status should be for all others. PS: I'm not a christian either.

So I take it you advocate the government legislating people's personal lives? I always thought marriage was between two people and their beliefs, whatever they may be.

[placidfemme]

*sits back with my popcorn and watches the about-to-be homo bashing*

[oldrider]

The party that comes the closest (I am not a member) to my political beliefs is [www.libertarianz.org.nz] any where to the left of that is just leading towards "mediocrity" at best, Communism at worst!

You probably can go too far to the right (extremists?) granted but to the left is increasingly less freedom and more government in our lives.

In my opinion ACT is too far to the left for comfort but this country is full of home bred and brainwashed lefties.

New Zealanders are taught right through school to "ask the teacher" or do as you are "told" do not "think for your selves" vote the way the media "tells" you to!

If things get too difficult for you, don't face up to it, work hard and solve the problem, no, go to the pub, have another drink, pop some pills, hold out your hand and Uncle Helen will give you a little something to go get by on.

For those that get out of line and become self sufficient, Uncle Helen will tax them even more so that they have not got time to relax and enjoy their well earned wealth, they will be too busy supporting all her social welfare schemes and other little hand outs.

Read the information on the Libertarianz Webb site and compare it to the crap the left wing parties feed you and for goodness sake "think" for your selves!

If you always do what you have always done, you will always get what you have always got.

Do you really like what you have always got from the government of the day? I think not! Cheers John.

[acewheelie]

WITH A CUNT LIKE WAYNE MAP ON BOARD I THINK NATIONALS CHANCES ARE SLIM , THAT 90 DAY BILL ALIENATED MOST OF THE WORKING PUBLIC BELOW MIDDLE MANAGEMENT , WE ALL KNOW NATIONALS AGENDA THAT UNEMPLOYMENT IS A GOOD THING

Wayne Mapp is one of the better politicians in the house, have you ever met the man?

and nothing wrong with the 90 day bill,give us managers the odd chance to say... mmmm your Fking useless, you're fired!!

F WIT!!

[LilSel]

*sits back with my popcorn and watches the about-to-be homo bashing*

X2