On the 90 days issue I would say this. I am a union rep and have been in CEA negotiations. (which might surprise some people from my earlier posts.) However, what I have learnt is that it is very good, when in a debate, to put yourself in the other person's position. So to all those out there who disagree with the 90 days, put yourself in the position of the owner of the business. If you owned a business, would you want to take the risk on an employee who looked great initially but soon started to really screw you around. Not likely so therefore you don't employ anyone and everyone loses. The guts of it is, if you are a good employee, you have nothing to worry about. You can leave whenever you want. There are good employees and there are bad employees, just the same as there are good employers and there are bad employers. But employers should have the ability to dismiss an employee who is not up to it.

I feel a snapper coming on!!!! Don't twist that!!