
Originally Posted by
MikeL
The role of the American pulp and paper industry, threatened by competition from hemp, in the criminalization of marijuana in the 1920s raises awkward questions that defenders of the status quo prefer to ignore...
It's hard to imagine a pulp and paper industry being threatened by hemp.
Forests, particularly renewable forests, produce considerably more fibre per hectare a lot easier than can hemp crops. Hemp is an annual crop that requires harvesting, resowing and all of the agriculture associated with this. "Optimum" yields are rarely reached, because of bird damage (birds love the stuff) and assault from a range of other pests that are rather partial to hemp.
Hemp is also a comparatively coarse fibre, best used for linen-type fabrics. Pulverising it to a form that would allow it to be used for paper manufacture would require additional processing.
"Commercial" hemp production is largely a third-world venture, assisted by low labour costs and minimal controls on sustainable land use.
Also commercial hemp contains extremely low levels of THC -- the "active" ingredient in marijuana. Your average reefer-head would soon lose interest in trying to get a rush from inhaling hemp smoke.
"Standing on your mother's corpse you told me that you'd wait forever." [Bryan Adams: Summer of 69]
Bookmarks