Kahui twins' father out on bail

**The_Dover** · 10th November 2006, 13:34

Originally Posted by 98tls

let him be bubbas bitch for a while...if he didnt do it then maybe he will tell who did....

well, he'll certainly squeal

**jetboy** · 10th November 2006, 13:38

Originally Posted by 98tls

he was there when it happened...if it wasnt him then he knows who it was and isnt saying....to me thats just as bad...jesus were talking about two babies...like i said...let him be bubbas bitch for a while...if he didnt do it then maybe he will tell who did....

so were the rest of that family. shove them all in the slammer. Farkin hell did people forget that 2 babies were severly beaten to death?

**ManDownUnder** · 10th November 2006, 13:39

Originally Posted by Clockwork

FFS You people really have a problem with the concept of "innocent until proven guilty" don't you?

Christ, I hope I never get accused of a heinous crime. Not too much danger of a fair trial around here.

Credit where it's due - good call.

**Joni** · 10th November 2006, 13:40

Originally Posted by Clockwork

FFS You people really have a problem with the concept of "innocent until proven guilty" don't you?

Actually no I dont have a problem with the concept at all.

However when somone is accused of taking another life (and in this case 2), I feel he should stay behind bars until he has been proven innocent - murder is muder mate... and if there is a 1% chance he is guilty he should be kept away from other children until his trial starts.

If he was accused of mowing down a group of people with an AK47 he would sure as shit not be let out on bail... so why with 2 children...

**Clockwork** · 10th November 2006, 13:43

Originally Posted by marty

what are you? a three hugger? or worse, a lawyer?

luckily this isn't a court, so we can slag off and convict whom ever we want.

those children were innocent until dead. didn't help them did it

I'm someone who's doing his best to let the system work. Obviously I don't have the unquestioning faith in the infallibility of the Police that the rest of you have.

Its not like they've never got it wrong before!

**The_Dover** · 10th November 2006, 13:44

yeah man, everyone knows i'm too slow to get a speeding ticket.......it was a setup.

**Clockwork** · 10th November 2006, 13:47

Originally Posted by Joni

Actually no I dont have a problem with the concept at all.

However when somone is accused of taking another life (and in this case 2), I feel he should stay behind bars until he has been proven innocent - murder is muder mate... and if there is a 1% chance he is guilty he should be kept away from other children until his trial starts.

If he was accused of mowing down a group of people with an AK47 he would sure as shit not be let out on bail... so why with 2 children...

If there were credible witnesses, I'd agree with you, but this case doesn't have a that does it? None of us knows who know what..... we just need a whipping boy, it seems.

**jetboy** · 10th November 2006, 13:51

Originally Posted by Clockwork

I'm someone who's doing his best to let the system work. Obviously I don't have the unquestioning faith in the infallibility of the Police that the rest of you have.

Its not like they've never got it wrong before!

But the system doesn't work! Well not for me anyway!

**Clockwork** · 10th November 2006, 13:56

Originally Posted by jetboy

But the system doesn't work! Well not for me anyway!

Yes... it probably could be bettered..... but not by a lynch mob.

**The_Dover** · 10th November 2006, 14:05

they'll try to help

**jetboy** · 10th November 2006, 14:41

lynchmob huh - very nice

**Lou Girardin** · 10th November 2006, 17:56

Originally Posted by jetboy

Under normal circumstances yes, and I'd be the first to say I was wrong should be be proven innocent - but c'mon dude...he reeks guilt.

What do you know that we don't?

**crashe** · 10th November 2006, 18:14

He is out on bail with the following strict conditions:

24 hour curfew at a house outside of Auckland that is stated by the courts.
No contact whatsoever with the King family (thats Macyina King and her family)
No contact whatsoever with any child under the age of 12 years of age.

If he breaks any of these conditions then he goes back into prison.

I would also imagine that they have somehow added in no booze or drugs in that condition in the small print.

Personally I dont think he should be given bail.......
But then I also believe that the rest of the so called "Tight 12" should also have been charged for failing to speak to the cops etc.
I belive that there is more than one person involved in the death's of these two tiny boys.

I would like to know why, when after one baby stopped breathing and the 'aunt' did resuss on the little one and that they feared that they had cracked the ribs...... why the hell they didnt take the little one to hospital.
If anyone stops breathing and you get them breathing again you take them to get them checked out by the Dr and nurses to make sure that you didnt break a rib especially on a tiny baby that was so prem etc etc...

RIP Chris and Cru.