Yes, I am pedantic about spelling and grammar so get used to it!
Lost my brother to a drunk driver, and had to pick up many more off the roads over the years too. I am unashamedly vocal and passionate about getting drunk drivers off the road, as most people who know me will verify.
There is no excuse, it is vehicular manslaughter and should be charged/punished as such.
![]()
![]()
"If you can't laugh at yourself, you're just not paying attention!"
"There is no limit to dumb."
"Resolve to live with all your might while you do live, and as you shall wish you had done ten thousand years hence."
$2,000 cash if you find a buyer for my house, kumeuhouseforsale@straightshooters.co.nz for details
I'm not quite sure what you mean, do you mean proportionally? I would expect more sober people to kill, there's more of them. Are drunk drivers more likely to crash than sober drivers? The government would like us to think so.
He is turd, and I'll wager a twenty that he'll be on the news the next night going 'Boo hoo, I didn't really mean it, I'm real reall soz for da family.' Of course he won't actually be sorry, just the public back lash has mad him think twice about letting the country know how much of a prick he really is.
Interestingly enough, making an assertation and then calling it fact doesn't actually lend it any weight. The only fact there is that it is your belief.
There you go, doing it again. I can see the point you're trying to make, but you're letting down your ability to put forward your argument by being a cunt. Just in case you wondering why you're being attacked over your opinion.
The what? Just for DIC or is there more to this?
That's possibly a little draconian, a little hard to enforce... given that certain medications give false positives. It could make for some interesting debates at the lock up
No car = steal someone elses...
Exactly...
This is relevant how?
My only concern is how are the police going to enforce this...
The explanation was good, this last little bit spoilt it though.
They're the hard core, you won't stop them. Sterlizing might help to reduce the problem in future generations however.
Ummmm...isn't that exactly what I said?
The fact is that I would rather do that...which does make it fact, because it is a fact that it is my preference??? Please take notice of the word in bold.
I'm letting nothing down, nor wondering anything...and in case you're a little bit slow, getting attacked for being a "cunt" is the very reason I make such posts as above...I enjoy it.
"I'm gonna get to the bottom of this, and I dont give a fuck if you're at the top!!!"
Well that would be a rational thought, and might possibly be true too!.
But what i see leads me to believe that it is the Drunks that do more damage...for instance if a drunk looses control of a vehicle , its highly unlikely that he will recover the vehicle enough to be in control, where as a Sober driver might have enough time and skill to Drive out of the situation thereby only causing a glancing blow with minimal injurys....its a bit like target fixation, the sober driver reacts where the drunk just goes WTF and drives straight at the other car.
Also its highly likely that the Drunk will not be the one to loose his/her life, as it goes Ive gone to more accidents where the drunk has killed someone, yet survived the crash him/herself.
I dont like statistics as I reckon they only show what the govment want it to show!!!.
...
...
Grass wedges its way between the closest blocks of marble and it brings them down. This power of feeble life which can creep in anywhere is greater than that of the mighty behind their cannons....... - Honore de Balzac
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks