911 conspiracy on tv 16 december

[Skyryder]

http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon...witnesses.html

Interesting for those who do not believe.

Skyryder

[The_Dover]

Suppose you believe Santa's fueling up his Reindeer about now too?

maybe, but that ain't a diesel pump that the old perv keeps in his pants and AFAIK the fuel goes in the other end of a reindeer..

[geoffm]

Maybe so, but for every knowledgable person (in that particular field) like yourself, there is another who is just as credible, if not more, who disagrees with that explanation.

Especially when it comes to how the building's managed to fall at near free fall speed, and the unexplained collapse of tower 7, which suffered no impact which kinda fucks up your pattern, guess that could be why they won't release that report on tower 7's collapse aye?

Even the experts can't agree, research will discover that.

Per your questions, look at http://www.civil.usyd.edu.au/wtc.shtml (bottom half). For details on the buildings, a short description is at http://www.tms.org/pubs/journals/JOM...agar-0112.html. If you can't sleep, the full report is on the NIST website.
Don't forget with WTC7, the building were interconnected by underground parking and space, with joined foundations. Collapse of the other towers and destruction of the mutual supports doesn't do the structural stability much good.
I had a quick google - man there are some flakes out there with no idea of physics and engineering (or logic). Stridently declaiming something is so, without any supporting evidence whatsoever, doesn't make it so.
Geoff