(1) The approval process exists to stop the poor woman having a thalidimide kid when she pops down to the doctor for something to help her with her morning sickness. I.e. they didn't experiment enough on healthy people. They certainly didn't test it enough on any pregnant women prior to releasing it on a large scale for general use.
(2) Experimentation. At some stage all the theory must be tried out in practice. Some you win. Some you lose. Most probably do sweet FA. N years and millions in research down the tubes.
(3) Vivisection. Ah yes the moral high ground. No one can really defend this can they... Morally it's sorta like paedophilia*.
(4) Motivation for a pharmaceutical is like any company - Survivability and accountability to the owner (s).
(5) The motivation of the people indulging in research in pharmaceutical firms is probably the same as your sister in law. The desire to help our fellow human being's etc.
(6) The example you give of the development of 'Tramidol' would not have been possible without a thorough understanding of opiate chemistry and its pharmacological effects. Understanding gained through previous research. Research that no doubt involved plenty of points (2) and (3) above...
Surely this must make 'Tramidol' ethically unclean.
* unless of course you happen to be a Catholic priest. Then vivisection, like kiddy fiddling is Aok. Ugh just had a horrible image of a Priest in a vivisection lab, with bulgin' eyes and a raging hardon, looking 'round, going "Sweety?"
Ah yes. I forgot. One musn't express an opinion.
Sorry. My mistake.
Bookmarks