Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 27

Thread: I, Robot

  1. #1
    Join Date
    3rd July 2003 - 12:00
    Bike
    Scorpio, XL1200N
    Location
    forests of azure
    Posts
    9,398

    I, Robot

    Saw the movie on Friday night.

    I was a little apprehensive about shattered envisionings, etc. I grew up on Asimov's robot stories (among others) and have always had a soft spot for his fiction. I remember feeling genuinely sad when I heard about his death in 1992. As far as I'm aware, he's still the only author that has had at least one work published in every single sub-classification of the Dewey system. His fiction style, which is more of a minimalist zen-like non-style in its simplicity and straightforwardness, is uniquely refreshing and readable; you read *through* the words, if you like, rather than being aware that you're Reading A Story.

    So if you're not familiar with Asimov's work, pop down to the library and borrow one of his short-story anthologies, or read the Foundation trilogy.

    Anyway. The movie.

    If I had to rate it, I'd give it three-and-a-half stars out of four.

    It wasn't anything like a direct adaptation of any of his robot stories. What it was, was... a new story, true to their spirit. Really. I say that without any hint of silliness. It contained several very recognisable themes and sequences from his older robot stories, such as the single robot that was, somehow, different, and tried to hide among other outwardly identical units. The robot that dreamed of salvation. The question of consciousness. Susan Calvin. Not Susan Calvin anything in particular, just Susan Calvin. A US Robotics HQ building that looked like USR HQ should look.

    And the cliché Outmoded Gasoline-Powered Vehicle Pulled from Dusty Garage by Main Character in SF Movie after Losing Original High Tech Conveyance was... an MV Agusta F4.

    Class.
    kiwibiker is full of love, an disrespect.
    - mikey

  2. #2
    Join Date
    18th April 2004 - 19:47
    Bike
    Kawasaki en 450 LTD
    Location
    Rotorua
    Posts
    797
    well I have seen the ad's on Tv and thought it looked like a good 'un will definately go and see it now thanks.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    13th January 2004 - 11:00
    Bike
    Honda PC800
    Location
    Henderson -auckland
    Posts
    14,163
    thanks random--You put so well my reasons for not wanting to see the movie.
    Asimov has always been one of my favorite authors. -Funny innit how so much he wrote as science fiction has now become science fact ?
    To see a life newly created.To watch it grow and prosper. Isn't that the greatest gift a human being can be given?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    21st January 2004 - 13:00
    Bike
    Sold
    Location
    Ak
    Posts
    3,989
    Quote Originally Posted by jrandom
    Saw the movie on Friday night.

    ...Anyway. The movie.

    If I had to rate it, I'd give it three-and-a-half stars out of four.

    It wasn't anything like a direct adaptation of any of his robot stories. What it was, was... a new story, true to their spirit. Really. I say that without any hint of silliness. It contained several very recognisable themes and sequences from his older robot stories, such as the single robot that was, somehow, different, and tried to hide among other outwardly identical units. The robot that dreamed of salvation. The question of consciousness. Susan Calvin. Not Susan Calvin anything in particular, just Susan Calvin. A US Robotics HQ building that looked like USR HQ should look.

    And the cliché Outmoded Gasoline-Powered Vehicle Pulled from Dusty Garage by Main Character in SF Movie after Losing Original High Tech Conveyance was... an MV Agusta F4.

    Class.
    Quite entertaining in its entirety - I gave it a 7/10 for unique story, great effects, and good acting (even by Will Smith in a semi-serious role )...not happy with the "use the F4 as a missile" idea though!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    10th September 2003 - 12:00
    Bike
    niente
    Location
    Brightwater
    Posts
    705
    Quote Originally Posted by Zed
    Quite entertaining in its entirety - I gave it a 7/10 for unique story, great effects, and good acting (even by Will Smith in a semi-serious role )...not happy with the "use the F4 as a missle" idea though!
    Blame the Matrix for that one !! Trinity launched a F4 into that power station (although it was actually a 600 monster with f4 bodywork).
    Matt Thompson

  6. #6
    Join Date
    3rd July 2003 - 12:00
    Bike
    Scorpio, XL1200N
    Location
    forests of azure
    Posts
    9,398
    Quote Originally Posted by matthewt
    Blame the Matrix for that one !! Trinity launched a F4 into that power station (although it was actually a 600 monster with f4 bodywork).
    Was that supposed to be an F4? I lazily ID'd it as another 996.

    That motorway chase scene in Reloaded was some of the best bike-riding CGI stuntery I've seen, I think. Gave me fond memories of the northwestern motorway on Monday mornings.
    kiwibiker is full of love, an disrespect.
    - mikey

  7. #7
    Join Date
    16th September 2003 - 11:36
    Posts
    6,427
    yeah i watch i robot yesterday on vcd dc:< wasn't to bad.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    13th October 2003 - 13:12
    Bike
    07 CBR1000RR
    Location
    Howick, Auckland
    Posts
    311
    Ugg some day I shall go and see it - Its one that’s on my List of movies to go and see. Hopefully at a theatre on the big screen that having to download the bloody thing of DC++

  9. #9
    Join Date
    30th March 2004 - 11:00
    Bike
    2001 RC46
    Location
    Norfshaw
    Posts
    10,455
    Blog Entries
    17
    Quote Originally Posted by jrandom
    It wasn't anything like a direct adaptation of any of his robot stories. What it was, was... a new story, true to their spirit. Really. I say that without any hint of silliness. It contained several very recognisable themes and sequences from his older robot stories, such as the single robot that was, somehow, different, and tried to hide among other outwardly identical units. The robot that dreamed of salvation.
    So it was only very loosely based on the "I, Robot" novel?
    ... and that's what I think.

    Or summat.


    Or maybe not...

    Dunno really....


  10. #10
    Join Date
    3rd July 2003 - 12:00
    Bike
    Scorpio, XL1200N
    Location
    forests of azure
    Posts
    9,398
    Quote Originally Posted by firestormer
    So it was only very loosely based on the "I, Robot" novel?
    *Thwack*! 'I, Robot' wasn't a novel, it was a short-story anthology.

    But yes, 'very loosely' would be right. Some of the stuff in the movie was even taken from other, post-'I, Robot' Asimov stories. The only commonality in the movie was the setting, the 'story world' if you like, and a couple of the main characters.
    kiwibiker is full of love, an disrespect.
    - mikey

  11. #11
    Join Date
    15th March 2004 - 13:00
    Bike
    Austrian and Italian
    Location
    Glenfield, Auckland
    Posts
    4,687
    Saw it yesterday, for those of you like me that go to the movies to be entertained, it does its job well.

    For those of you who go to the movies to pick apart and critisize, you'll hate it.
    Every minute of it.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    30th March 2004 - 11:00
    Bike
    2001 RC46
    Location
    Norfshaw
    Posts
    10,455
    Blog Entries
    17
    Quote Originally Posted by jrandom
    *Thwack*! 'I, Robot' wasn't a novel, it was a short-story anthology.
    Oops - my bad.:confused2 Now that you mention it, I vaguely remember it/them.
    But go easy there, young fella - 'twould have been at least 30 years ago that I read it. And my memory (like the rest of me) isn't what it once were.
    Quote Originally Posted by Devil
    Saw it yesterday, for those of you like me that go to the movies to be entertained, it does its job well.

    For those of you who go to the movies to pick apart and critisize, you'll hate it.
    Every minute of it.
    So it's almost excessively Hollywoodised?
    Yeah, I'm a picker-aparter. But only when I'm not grabbed by what I'm watching. Sometimes I can actually manage to ignore all the bollocks and just enjoy the spectacle. Sometimes...
    ... and that's what I think.

    Or summat.


    Or maybe not...

    Dunno really....


  13. #13
    Join Date
    16th September 2003 - 11:36
    Posts
    6,427
    Quote Originally Posted by danb
    Ugg some day I shall go and see it - Its one that’s on my List of movies to go and see. Hopefully at a theatre on the big screen that having to download the bloody thing of DC++
    ahhh good ol dc++ i use to use that, i use bit torrent at work
    to get must of my stuff now, only have poor dialup at home

  14. #14
    Join Date
    15th March 2004 - 13:00
    Bike
    Austrian and Italian
    Location
    Glenfield, Auckland
    Posts
    4,687
    Quote Originally Posted by firestormer
    So it's almost excessively Hollywoodised?
    Yeah, I'm a picker-aparter. But only when I'm not grabbed by what I'm watching. Sometimes I can actually manage to ignore all the bollocks and just enjoy the spectacle. Sometimes...
    Yeah, theres definately hollywood in there (Its Will Smith, duh! ). But a movie doesnt have to be hollywood to be entertaining!

    But not looking at my watch was a good sign.

    EDIT: re-read your post. No not excessive hollywood, but definately hollywood. It could be worse.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    5th January 2004 - 11:00
    Bike
    2008, GSR600K
    Location
    Hutt hutt hooray!
    Posts
    2,924
    I went and saw it this morning & really enjoyed it. I had thought (before reading JR's review) that it would be a peice of shite but it was a good peice of movie.
    My goal in life is to be as good a person as my dog already thinks I am.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •