"Speed has never killed anyone. Suddenly becoming stationary - that's what gets you."
Jeremy Clarkson.
Kawasaki 200mph Club
Claiming a Windows system is not secure (or unstable for that matter) does no more than demonstrate a complete lack of operating knowledge.
"I'm gonna get to the bottom of this, and I dont give a fuck if you're at the top!!!"
It's people like you that make people like me keep people like Aladdin in business.
kiwibiker is full of love, an disrespect.
- mikey
Name me ONE windows operating system available today that is 100% secure. The 'band aid' approach doesnt work.
The only flaw with Macs is that I sometimes use MSN - which is a microsoft product. And even then the only virus' that can attack only affect msn, nothing else.
"Speed has never killed anyone. Suddenly becoming stationary - that's what gets you."
Jeremy Clarkson.
Kawasaki 200mph Club
DOS by itself is a is secure and a very quick OS. As for flawed... how... yes it is an old OS using old technology, but not flawed.
The orginal Windows was not sold as a OS but sold as a GUI to be used with DOS (Big difference) you had to already have dos on your PC.
As for the buying it... so!?! this happens all the time with business whats your point, I have done similar things myself in th ebusiness world.
I would call the MAC OS secure either, no system is...
I dont think they've invented any software yet thats uncrackable :-)
Personally, the more any company tries to protect its code, the more actively I will go out of my way to share copies of it :-)
Their is entirely too much crap software, and overpriced software out there to do anything BUT pirate imho.
If software is REALLY good, and reasonably priced, I might buy it, otherwise the software companies can all burn in the firey pits of /dev/null
.
Secure? DOS had no security features whatsoever! It didn't even have any concept of 'user identity'!
I suppose the fact that it also had no networking features meant that it was secure by default, inasmuch as it was impossible to attack remotely.
But then, by that definition, a lump of wood is also 'secure'. It's not very useful, though.
I'm really not sure what you're going on about.
kiwibiker is full of love, an disrespect.
- mikey
High-profile companies the world over use Microsoft OS, not Mac's.
You're a dreamer if you think OS X is 100% secure.
If Mac's became the most popular system, they would be in the same boat as Microsoft is now in regards to viruses etc.
The creators and attackers don't give a shit about disrupting a tiny little proprortion of users that use a Mac. They feel bad enough for you using a Mac, without infecting your 'PC' as well.
"I'm gonna get to the bottom of this, and I dont give a fuck if you're at the top!!!"
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks