The firearm thread

[Grumph]

Excessive use of the multi-quote button should be a crime. I'd like to see that limited to 5 shots please, Mods.

For once, like it or not, gun lovers, looks like the public will get what we want. Hard cheese if you have to surrender something.

[jasonu]

What happens if I don't hand in my Rifle? Do the Police show up? If I refuse to comply - what happens next? That's right - the Armed Offenders squad.

.

They'll show up at your house loooooooong before they try to get the gang guns.

[TheDemonLord]

Excessive use of the multi-quote button should be a crime. I'd like to see that limited to 5 shots please, Mods.

For once, like it or not, gun lovers, looks like the public will get what we want. Hard cheese if you have to surrender something.

Just remember that if/when they come for something you like.

Be very wary of the Standards you set for others, lest they be used against you.

[TheDemonLord]

They'll show up at your house loooooooong before they try to get the gang guns.

The same Gangs that publicly admitted to owning illegal firearms and publicly admitted they wouldn't hand them back.

Yes, The irony would be hilarious if it wasn't tragic.

[husaberg]

The irony would be hilarious if it wasn't tragic.

Its it be as tragic as you losing the ability to play rambo.
PS third times acharm.

2C Meaning of prohibited part
In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires, prohibited part means—
(a)a part of a prohibited firearm:
(b)a component that can be applied to enable, or take significant steps towards enabling, a firearm to be fired with, or near to, a semi-automatic or automatic action.

They'll show up at your house loooooooong before they try to get the gang guns.

2010
1146 illegal guns seized
They got something like 6000 gun off criminals in the last few years.

2017
557 guns have been seized in Christchurch since January 1. Of those, 219 were due to criminal offences and 138 were destructions, some of which were handed in voluntarily. Sixty-three involved family harm incidents where police decided to take guns from the property.

In america they give them back afterwards just like they did to the North Hollywood shootout bank robbers aye.

[TheDemonLord]

Its it be as tragic as you losing the ability to play rambo.
PS third times acharm.

So why are Sights or Suppressors included? Neither of those components have an impact on the Action of a Firearm. A Suppresor or a Sight cannot make a Rifle Semi-Automatic or Fully-Automatic.

This is the problem, the wording is TERRIBLE, which you refuse to admit. That Terrible wording is why this is Bad legislation, even if you agree with the Ban of Semi-Autos.

If that was the goal, then you'd only specify components which actually affected the Action of a Firearm - but that's not what we've got... We've got a wording which paraphrased is 'Ban everything that looks Scary'

[husaberg]

So why are Sights or Suppressors included? Neither of those components have an impact on the Action of a Firearm. A Suppresor or a Sight cannot make a Rifle Semi-Automatic or Fully-Automatic.

This is the problem, the wording is TERRIBLE, which you refuse to admit. That Terrible wording is why this is Bad legislation, even if you agree with the Ban of Semi-Autos.

If that was the goal, then you'd only specify components which actually affected the Action of a Firearm - but that's not what we've got... We've got a wording which paraphrased is 'Ban everything that looks Scary'

The problem is it doesnt say what would suit you for it to say and you are steadfastly refusing to see logic.
Look i can't make you understand, as you are behaving in a hysterical manner but i have given you what is in the act the PARTS THAT MAKE UP AN AR15 or similar are included when they are part and only PART OF WHAT YOU NEED TO BE ABLE TO ASSEMBLE A ND OPERATE A FUNCTIONAL working AR15 or similar. This is clearly to stop people selling parts of a prohibited weapon in pieces to a A class licence holder.

[Katman]

Verbal ping-pong played by two retards.

[jasonu]

In america they give them back afterwards just like they did to the North Hollywood shootout bank robbers aye.

Woshu talkin bout Willis?

[husaberg]

Verbal ping-pong played by two retards.

Cool story. That pic i posted the other day of you following around and stalking me like a love sick puppy has nearly go a hundred views already cheers.
https://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/s...post1131129061

[husaberg]

Woshu talkin bout Willis?

On July 20, 1993, Phillips and Matasareanu robbed an armored car outside a branch of FirstBank in Littleton, Colorado. On October 29, they were arrested in Glendale, northeast of Los Angeles, for speeding. A subsequent search of their vehicle—after Phillips surrendered with a concealed weapon—found two semi-automatic rifles, two handguns, more than 1,600 rounds of 7.62×39mm rifle ammunition, 1,200 rounds of 9×19mm Parabellum and .45 ACP handgun ammunition, radio scanners, smoke bombs, improvised explosive devices, body armor vests, and three different California license plates.[ Initially charged with conspiracy to commit robbery,both served one hundred days in jail and were placed on three years' probation. After their release, most of their seized property was returned to them, except for the confiscated firearms and explosives.

My memory is even most of the guns were returned.
Watch the video or the movie

[jasonu]

My memory is even most of the guns were returned.
Watch the video or the movie

So its not true and you are just making shit up. Thanks for the confirmation.

[Katman]

That pic i posted the other day of you following around and stalking me like a love sick puppy has nearly go a hundred views already cheers.

Stunning effort.

[husaberg]

Going by what you just quoted, your memory is incorrect.

I reailse that thats why i added what my recollection was.
That still means they returened the vests scanner and ammunition and released them after 100 days.

Stunning effort.

little effort was needed to be expended in making you look foolish.
look at another 50 views
https://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/s...post1131129061

[FJRider]

Both. If it is law it should be written water tight or at least close to it. This is far from that standard.

How it is written ... means both law enforcement and the general public ... might get their chance to prove themselves correct in a court of law.