The Guardian newspaper recently published a podcast discussing antique firearms and "ghost" ammunition. Seemingly gangs in Britain are using antique guns and non-commercially loaded ammunition to get around firearms restrictions. The British definition of "antique" seems quite relaxed as the article mentioned WW2 era pistols. Ammunition for the majority of those is still available and widely used.
The paper engaged the services of an expert to assist with the podcast. It seems though that the main asset he brought to the interview was an American accent. Actual expertise was in short supply.
To learn about "ghost bullets", a colourful journalistic phrase, detectives visited a known local reloader who sometimes onsells to dealers. They showed him a variety of ammunition and he advised them as to what it was and how it would have been created. At one point he examined a round and identified it as one that he had loaded. Nothing was said, the discussion continued and eventually the detectives left.
Later they returned with a warrant for his arrest. He was tried and sentenced to twenty years jail. He appealed but the appeal failed.
The reloader didn't even try and conceal the fact that he had created the round, he was quite open about it as he was entitled to be. He did not sell ammunition to any gang member, he supplied it to a dealer who onsold it. I can't help but feel that, on the evidence presented in the podcast, a major injustice has been done.
The British justice system is on a parlous state currently following years of massive budget cuts and restrictions to legal aid etc. Reading general warnings about the failure of the sytem is one thing. An apparent travesty such as this is another entirely.
https://www.theguardian.com/news/aud...ullets-podcast
Bookmarks