If you can be a Biden supporter and support the views that were, shall we say, common at Charlottesville, then it stands to reason that those views aren't 'Right Wing', they are something else.
Plenty of People in the Democrats (And labour in the UK) currently have got a number of Opinions on Israel, Plenty of people at Charlottesville ALSO have an opinion 'The Jewish Question'.
There's an Excellent quote from Jordan Peterson about this:
Now, he uses Radical Rightists in the speech, but my view of this is: They are both playing the same game, they are on the same side of the political spectrum - The Libertarian Right Wing (that wants small Government and individual identities and individual rights is the polar opposite of the radical left that wants group identities and group rights.The radical rightists are playing identity politics just like the radical leftists. They just say "Yeah, the world is divided up on racial grounds, just like the radical leftists claim, and I happen to be white. And I'm going to win this game!"
I could be generous and grant you Horseshoe Theory, but I'm not feeling generous.
You could probably No True Scotsman me - the fact is that Group/collectivist identities (as expressed by the Far Left and the so-called 'Far right') is diametrically opposed to the individual world view of Conservatism. I'm half tempted to post the Wikipedia link to Conservatism and point out all the times it talks about 'The individual'
Eh, I'll get to that in a moment.
Except for one teensy tiny detail - It's not the Right Wing that gets free reign in Universities, Social Media, Mainstream media etc. You can get on Mainstream TV and say:
"I'm a literal Communist" and no one batts an eye.
You could not say "I'm a literal Fascist/Nazi" and get the same treatment.
My personal preference would be that both groups of people would be yeeted into the persona non grata category. One is, the other isn't.
In terms of mainstream acceptability:
Does this prove my point? Can you show something at a Conservative or Republican conference with people echoing 'Far Right' Slogans?
But when I ask you to call them what they are, Communist Revolutionaries, you suddenly go Shy. When I point to the Mainstream Media running defense/interference for the causes of the Riots and show blatantly false headlines, you again go Shy.
You defend them against the accusation of being what they are as vigorously as I accuse them.
That's the sort of Tacit approval you're accusing me of.
So, I'd be a NASCARBIKE then?
I don't entirely agree, but I don't entirely disagree either....
Right, stop there, Think.
Why.
If you earnestly believe that Russia and China will benefit, Why.
Do Russia and China have a shared Ideological tradition? One that makes them fundamentally opposed to Western Liberal democracy? With the fall of the Soviet Union - it was clear that trying to bash down the gates would never work.
Let me take a quick Segway, I know I've posted the Yuri Bezmenov clip before, but his talks on what the KGB was doing, specifically in Western Universities is entirely relevant:
You teach one generation of Students Marxist inspired crap (Post Modernism, Critical X theory, Feminism etc.), they go out into the real world and disseminate the ideas (for example, you've heard of Systemic Racism), then you get the next Generation - who are being taught by the first and they become even more Radical and so on and so forth.
I've said for ages that the opening salvo in the 'Culture wars' was in 2011, 10 years ago - enough for an entire generation to go through and become increasingly radicalized. Long enough for ideas to be inserted into the Public consciousness.
So, let's take your statement that Civil War is incoming and China/Russia are salivating at the Prospect - if that is the case, is it not reasonable then to conclude that for something so favorable to their end-goals to be happening, that they might have had a hand in it?
We do have documentation from the Cold War that showed the Soviets were indeed funding various groups in the west (McCarthy was right and did nothing wrong...), what reason do you have to presume that they stopped?
There's an alternative: If everyone called out the Communist nonsense for the poison that it is, they would loose almost immediately. This is where that comment of 'I'll get back to that' comes
Re-asserting the Liberal traditions of the West, that a Good Society is made up of Good individuals, telling people that a little bit of Patriotism is okay and that despite our past issues, we aren't that bad.
If things were back in Balance, then I might be more inclined to pick on the flaws of the Right Wing a little more vigourously - I mean, afterall, I've said many times that Judith Collins is a Cunt, so it's not like I'm blindly aligned...
It seems that the Battle Ground of Critical Race theory is going to be the key - See, if you read enough CRT, you'll notice that they are explicitly go after the ideals of Martin Luther King's "I have a Dream" Speech, because it promotes Colourblindness - which if you are wanting Communism along Racial Lines instead of Class lines is a bit of an issue, so they are promoting the 'raising of Racial Consciousness'.
They are specifically doing it to Children (this is where the teaching of CRT comes in, they may not be teaching the University course, but they are teaching the principles of CRT), and that happens to be one of the areas where people who aren't as well versed in this go 'Wait, What?' - because it is attempting to undo the last 60 years of thought on Race.
Bookmarks