Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 28 of 28

Thread: F1 vs NASCAR vs IndyCar vs V8's

  1. #16
    Join Date
    9th November 2006 - 18:42
    Bike
    Ducati V4S Streetfighter
    Location
    Orewa, Auckland
    Posts
    4,120
    Blog Entries
    1
    And americans obviously can't drive around anything more complex than a big oval. Bring back the british touring car coverage - all argy bargy and more entertaining to watch than some bunch of numptys driving around in circles.

    Besides.... this is a biker forum isn't it? Shouldn't we be discussing GP or superbikes rather than cage-racing? And no... virtualsuper14 is different - we have some wagers going on that.

  2. #17
    Join Date
    25th December 2003 - 20:57
    Bike
    None
    Location
    NZ
    Posts
    2,271
    Quote Originally Posted by Toaster View Post
    And americans obviously can't drive around anything more complex than a big oval. Bring back the british touring car coverage - all argy bargy and more entertaining to watch than some bunch of numptys driving around in circles.
    Don't be dissing the oval! lol


    -Indy
    Hey, kids! Captain Hero here with Getting Laid Tip 213 - The Backrub Buddy!

    Find a chick who’s just been dumped and comfort her by massaging her shoulders, and soon, she’ll be massaging your prostate.


  3. #18
    Join Date
    22nd August 2003 - 22:33
    Bike
    ...
    Location
    NZ
    Posts
    4,205
    Blog Entries
    5
    watch nascar telemetry - 290kmh seems to be about tops.

    F1 telemetry - 320kmh seen quite often.

    superbikes - 300kmh seen easily

    indy cars - easily over 300 with gearing.

    watch any F1 v superbike. here's one here actually... the acceleration of the F1 car is quite frankly, phenomenal

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2mUBCNg3xO8

  4. #19
    Join Date
    11th February 2004 - 08:46
    Bike
    CB900
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    84
    The 2006 Indy 500 pole position speed (average speed over 4 laps) was 228.985 mph = 368.52km/h.

  5. #20
    If you think driving (or riding) around in circles is easy,I'd suggest you give it a try sometime.Nothing boring about it,not one bit!
    In and out of jobs, running free
    Waging war with society

  6. #21
    Join Date
    24th September 2006 - 02:00
    Bike
    -
    Location
    -
    Posts
    4,736
    Quote Originally Posted by http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formula_1#Cars_and_technology
    A wide variety of technologies – including active suspension, ground effect aerodynamics and turbochargers – are banned under the current regulations. Despite this the 2006 generation of cars can reach speeds of up to 350 km/h (around 220 mph) at some circuits (Monza).[9] A Honda Formula One car, running with minimum downforce on a runway in the Mojave desert achieved a top speed of 415 km/h (258 mph) in 2006. According to Honda, the car fully met the FIA Formula One regulations.
    If you're going to go 'round and 'round in a circle it's not hard to get fast lap speeds I suppose.

  7. #22
    Join Date
    17th February 2005 - 11:36
    Bike
    Bikes!
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    9,649
    Quote Originally Posted by Motu View Post
    If you think driving (or riding) around in circles is easy,I'd suggest you give it a try sometime.Nothing boring about it,not one bit!
    I agree... anyone that thinks that a 170+mph Nascar doesn't 'handle' is crazy. Indy cars are getting close to 400kmp/h.... you think they'd do that in a bad handling car? Those ovals might look ghey, but they're seriously nasty shite.

  8. #23
    Join Date
    24th September 2006 - 02:00
    Bike
    -
    Location
    -
    Posts
    4,736
    Oh I didn't mean that. I meant if you don't have hairpins and Stowe and Becketts, you're going to have much better average speeds, and particularly if you don't have to optimise for slower corners, top speeds are going to benefit.

  9. #24
    Join Date
    21st December 2005 - 23:41
    Bike
    HONDA EXPRESS
    Location
    forest brightly feathered
    Posts
    6,457

    imo

    cars suck, all cars, inc f1

    www.PhotoRecall.co.nz

  10. #25
    Join Date
    16th September 2004 - 16:48
    Bike
    PopTart Katoona
    Location
    CT, USA
    Posts
    6,542
    Blog Entries
    1
    Actually its quite difficult to increase speeds as the nascars loose instabilily comming out of the corners.
    And easy way to demonstrate the experiment is to take of your shoe, swing it really fast by the laces, then suddenly stop putting energy into it, and (after say 1 second) try and spin it fast again.
    Reactor Online. Sensors Online. Weapons Online. All Systems Nominal.

  11. #26
    Join Date
    6th November 2006 - 21:21
    Bike
    1985 Honda CX400
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    80
    Quote Originally Posted by jonbuoy View Post
    Would be interesting if they let the F1 teams go wild with whatever performance mods/technology they could just for a couple of seasons, see just how fast they could make them.
    Yeah HELL YEAH! Like pod racing on Star Wars. Extreme. No limits. set on a crazy big track. Maybe jumps too. Yeah jumps.

    Quote Originally Posted by Toaster View Post
    And americans obviously can't drive around anything more complex than a big oval. Bring back the british touring car coverage - all argy bargy and more entertaining to watch than some bunch of numptys driving around in circles.
    They do have 4 races a year currently on left and right turning tracks. But yes, there's a website called www.turnleftracing.com!

    I absolutely love F1 right, but do get pumped watching two Nascars side by side for the last few laps, both in contention for first. Intense.
    To split or not to split, that is the question

  12. #27
    Join Date
    24th September 2006 - 02:00
    Bike
    -
    Location
    -
    Posts
    4,736
    Quote Originally Posted by Lorax View Post
    Yeah HELL YEAH! Like pod racing on Star Wars. Extreme. No limits. set on a crazy big track. Maybe jumps too. Yeah jumps.



    They do have 4 races a year currently on left and right turning tracks. But yes, there's a website called www.turnleftracing.com!

    I absolutely love F1 right, but do get pumped watching two Nascars side by side for the last few laps, both in contention for first. Intense.
    When Monza was originally built, there used to be an oval racing track inside the actual Monza track. If you're familiar with the track, when you turn left through Vialone, there is/was an overbridge that you go under. This used to be part of the oval track. It was very steeply banked, Daytona had nothing on it; but most interestingly it went clockwise, compared to nearly all the oval racing we're familiar with, which goes counter-clockwise. In the mid to late 50s, I believe they even did a combined course in F1 which did a complete lap of the normal track and the oval; Fangio won it at least once.

  13. #28
    Join Date
    4th November 2003 - 13:00
    Bike
    BSA A10
    Location
    Rangiora
    Posts
    12,853
    Quote Originally Posted by marty View Post
    watch nascar telemetry - 290kmh seems to be about tops.
    Nacar used to quite regulary run 220+ mph speeds until they bought in restrictor plates for the Superspeedways
    "If you can make black marks on a straight from the time you turn out of a corner until the braking point of the next turn, then you have enough power."


    Quote Originally Posted by scracha View Post
    Even BP would shy away from cleaning up a sidecar oil spill.
    Quote Originally Posted by Warren Zevon
    Send Lawyers, guns and money, the shit has hit the fan

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •