
Originally Posted by
Pwalo
Is this about herbal remedies or legalising cannabis?
Let's do both.
Herbal "remedies" should be regulated. And they should have to undergo the same scientific rigour in their registration that pharmaceuticals currently do. Most of them are bullshit: in the same category as iridology, homoeopathy, colour therapy, aroma therapy and "organics". But, as they generally do no harm (apart from deluding the gullible and the ever-present bitter anaemic non-religious vegetarians) they generally slide under the radar. However given that Sue Kedgley is hot-to-trot on full disclosure of ingredients in foods, why should quack pills be any different?
And, as for inhaling carcinogenic smoke...
"Standing on your mother's corpse you told me that you'd wait forever." [Bryan Adams: Summer of 69]
Bookmarks