agree .. Coastal Defense should be at the forefront. Turn the old gun batteries in Devonport etc into Phalanx/ Harpoon / Exocet/ Yakhont anti ship missile batteries for an " OTH", Fire and Forget defense. Use the Coast Guard in smaller boats for Fisheries Protection , S&R and Smuggling Interdiction. one Fast Response Cutter and a 7 123 foot patrol boats would cost as much as one Frigate ...toss a few Exocet systems on the RNZ fleet ad you're sorted
as far as a NZ militia..where do i sign?
Navy ?? do we still have one ?? i thought they just sent out the locals in there waka
![]()
LIVE LIFE TO THE FULLEST SO WHEN YOU DIE YOUR FRIENDS DONT HAVE TO LIE AT YOUR FUNERAL
I think you're missing the true value of an offensive air capability in terms of homeland defence.
Granted, any potential invader's airpower can be used to drop bombs or land paratroops. Bombs never won a war on their own, and substantial airborne invasions are very unlikely from any of NZ's potential enemies, so shooting down enemy planes in and of itself is really the least of anyone's concerns in that respect.
However, the success or failure of any seaborne invasion hinges on air supremacy.
The Battle of Britain was fought as a prelude to Operation Sea Lion (Hitler's plan for seaborne invasion of the south coast of England). German air supremacy over the Channel would have made the British Navy's job in resisting such an invasion very, very difficult. Fortunately, British victory in the tussle for air supremacy put the nail in that particular German coffin.
Also, the major battles of the WW2 Pacific theatre, and the subsequent shift to aircraft carriers as the new capital ships of any large nation's fleet, made it clear that airpower, not ships' guns, was key to blue-water supremacy.
The ability to control the airspace around and beyond our shores and to strike offensively at blue-water targets from the air is a pre-requisite to any real defence against invasion from the sea. In this 21st century, any Navy that cannot operate under an airpower umbrella is doomed.
Viewed in that light, our Navy really is more of a Coast Guard. Our lack of airpower gives us very limited capability to respond to offensive actions by other nation-states.
kiwibiker is full of love, an disrespect.
- mikey
Sweden also has compulsary military service. Having trained people to call up when needed might be a help.
I'm all for it here. Gets you in shape so would help with the obesity problem, teaches discipline, etc. and just wanting to drive a tank might have something to do with it.
TOP QUOTE: “The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people’s money.”
NZ Marines ???...
boarding party more likely
http://www.navy.mil.nz/join-us/sits-...ations/scs.htm
again ... a role that the NZ Coast Guard should be doing .. more wasted resources
TOP QUOTE: “The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people’s money.”
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks