If the conviction is Quashed, the doubt over his guilt or innocence remains. I agree, a new trial may simply be too expensive to justify on the grounds that David has served over 80% of the original sentence.
I also hear the bells of compensation ringing loudly to the tune of millions.
David could then go anywhere in the world where he is unknown and enjoy a far better rest of his life.
Do you realise how many holes there could be if people would just take the time to take the dirt out of them?
It has been quashed. That's what the Privy Council determined yesterday.
"Standing on your mother's corpse you told me that you'd wait forever." [Bryan Adams: Summer of 69]
The privy council determined the conviction was unsafe and declared it 'quashed'. A new trial would not be desirable from anyone's pov after all this time.
Do you realise how many holes there could be if people would just take the time to take the dirt out of them?
If a conviction is quashed, then for the 'defendant' it is as if s/he was never prosecuted in the first place (legally speaking). In David's case he has spent 13yrs illegally detained. Either - he will be retried, found guilty and spend a further 3yrs inside - or he will be found not guilty and be in a position to claim compo - or the crown will decide to not retry and he will be in line for compo.
Any which way, we're all shafted again (in the pocket) because of dubious police work/ethics.
Do you realise how many holes there could be if people would just take the time to take the dirt out of them?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks