Scott Watson links

[Raine Logan]

i see this thread is old and while i'm familiar with most arguments as the the inappropriateness of mcdonalds appointment to watsons case, you seem to believe you know more.
why can't you say what that is? i for one would love to know; as would others.

[Mully]

i see this thread is old and while i'm familiar with most arguments as the the inappropriateness of mcdonalds appointment to watsons case, you seem to believe you know more.
why can't you say what that is? i for one would love to know; as would others.

Libel laws for one thing, would be my guess.

Plus keeping your powder dry......

[oldrider]

How about this summary:

'Watson is as guilty as Bain is innocent'.

Oddly enough on today's revelations and understanding of events, that summary is now more likely than ever to be correct!

[Raine Logan]

Libel laws for one thing, would be my guess.

Plus keeping your powder dry......

i thought it's only libel if it's not true.
(and i also thought i was replying to a specific post, glad you knew what i was talking about though, lol, thanks)

[oldrider]

i thought it's only libel if it's not true.
(and i also thought i was replying to a specific post, glad you knew what i was talking about though, lol, thanks)

Skyryder is having a little sabticle time out from KB currently, if he is the poster that you were directing your own reply post too!

[Raine Logan]

Skyryder is having a little sabticle time out from KB currently, if he is the poster that you were directing your own reply post too!

o0o ... hoping it wasn't for talking about scott watson. heh.
it was 'candor' i meant to address though.

[dangerous]

o0o ... hoping it wasn't for talking about scott watson. heh.
it was 'candor' i meant to address though.

then click "reply with quote" then we will know whom you refer.

Oldrider, good poingt the old bastard hasnt been on line for a while, perhaps I should visit the stick.

[oldrider]

then click "reply with quote" then we will know whom you refer.

Oldrider, good poingt the old bastard hasnt been on line for a while, perhaps I should visit the stick.

True! I thought old women his age didn't get a period anymore! Education just never stops, does it!

[Flip]

Well the dad has nothing to lose, but the 'fact' remains that Pope lied. Once you get into some of the finer detail there have been other instances of this sort of thing too. For instance court records show that Watson was convicted for burgely assault. When in fact his convictions were for burgerley, assault etc. The missing comma makes a lot of difference.. If memory serves me correctly these were eleven years 'prior' to the murders. Seems he had 'turned his life around somewhat.

Skyryder

The Jury would not have known about Scott Watsons convictions. (Which I actually think is wrong)

[dangerous]

Just a reminder... http://www.freescottwatson.com/

[neels]

Well, I don't know if he did it or not, but I'd be right pissed off if one of my kids was convicted on the evidence that he was. And I agree with previous posts that reasonable doubt that he did it would be that there is actually no evidence that anybody has been murdered, as there are no dead people to demonstrate this.

I know a couple of people that knew him, and agree that he was a bit of a bad boy when he was young, it doesn't mean he's a murderer (with no real motive).

Another good book is this one, written by someone that had no axe to grind but just thought it was all a bit dodgy...

The Marlborough Mystery

The Jury would not have known about Scott Watsons convictions. (Which I actually think is wrong)

The jury are supposed to decide guilt on the facts of the case, rather than presupposing that because somebody has been convicted of a crime previously they are a criminal and therefore must be guilty.

[freedom-wedge]

Scott Watson is just where he deserves to be..........ive met him and hes a freak...............end of story.

just like were looking for a black black man and any one will do. Once the crown/police decide they have their man despite people saying they actually dont, in this country the outcome is assured, and now if they dont get you the first time they get another jury and then another. So hes a bit different and has history where he stepped over the line for what ever reason, it dosnt make him guilty, nor does the fact the jury saw it a different way, the people who sat in jugement of Thomas got it dreadfully wrong becuase they were mislead, its all well documented and will be the case for Watson one day to the shame of our own Authorities I feel

[scumdog]

just like were looking for a black black man and any one will do. Once the crown/police decide they have their man despite people saying they actually dont, in this country the outcome is assured, and now if they dont get you the first time they get another jury and then another.

The way they got David Bain?

And the way he never got a second trial?

[scumdog]

ferkkin double-post shit..

[Littleman]

just like were looking for a black black man and any one will do. Once the crown/police decide they have their man despite people saying they actually dont, in this country the outcome is assured, and now if they dont get you the first time they get another jury and then another. So hes a bit different and has history where he stepped over the line for what ever reason, it dosnt make him guilty, nor does the fact the jury saw it a different way, the people who sat in jugement of Thomas got it dreadfully wrong becuase they were mislead, its all well documented and will be the case for Watson one day to the shame of our own Authorities I feel

I'm pretty sure BAIN/WATSON/THOMAS were white dude.