No
Yes
Don't Care
If the expected return is greater than the investment, yes.
Problem is we also have a number of international trade agreements that prevent tarrifs being put on competitive products or subsidies being aplpies to local products, and opting out of those trade agreements would cost NZ more than being in them (all things considered).
So that answer is yes - but we can't because of the greater good of the country's economy (again - I refer back to the trickledown, but swap in famers, vintners etc instead of boatbuilders)
$2,000 cash if you find a buyer for my house, kumeuhouseforsale@straightshooters.co.nz for details
$10m was the starting figure with perhaps another $24m to be tossed in
I'd be willing to bet that you wouldn't get every NZer to put in $2.50 if you asked them to fund a boat race
Wonder how many operations that would fund in the public health sector
and how much shorter it'd get the waiting lists?, never mind I'm sure the benefits we'll get from loosing the Americas cup will more than compensate
Not sure if you meant to do this but... I agree... I'm willing to bet coming 2nd had a spinoff also -albeit considerably less profitable than winning the thing..
Whether it breaks even is debatable but the loss will be minimised by the boost to the associated industries.
Out of curiousity... how much of the $10m (or $24m... whatever that overall total is) will be injected directly back into the NZ economy anyway? Training... some is done here, boat building - done here... etc.
I bet 1/3 of it is effectively the Govt "releasing cash" straight back into NZ anyway
$2,000 cash if you find a buyer for my house, kumeuhouseforsale@straightshooters.co.nz for details
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks