Guys, the problem you are trying to comprehend is called "moral equivalence". An armed guy hurt an unarmed guy. Let's protect *THE UNDERDOG*!!! An unarmed guy is always good, an armed guy is always bad, right? What is lost in translation is that the poor underdog is a bandit, a criminal, simply by the virtue of participating in a criminal gang. If the laws choose to ignore this distinction, then, yes, WE HAVE BAD LAWS that need to be changed (and enforced too).
"People are stupid ... almost anyone will believe almost anything. Because people are stupid, they will believe a lie because they want to believe it's true, or because they are afraid it might be true. People's heads are full of knowledge, facts, and beliefs, and most of it is false, yet they think it all true ... they can only rarely tell the difference between a lie and the truth, and yet they are confident they can, and so all are easier to fool." -- Wizard's First Rule
Bookmarks