Clamp round one of the wheels...
they clamped 4 bikes there, and one got towed...
there was a fuck up with the signs tho, 2 different companies with the new company having just put up their ones whilst the others were still there.... we were telling them we'll give our money to the other company instead... just to piss them off...
here's an idea. buy your own clamp. clamp your car when you go shopping. when the real clamp dude comes round he'll see the clamp and think it's already been done, so he'll ignore it!
remove your clamp when you get back, and drive away! simple!
No, just telephones I think (not sure of the exact NZ rules). Everyday you're under the gaze of security cameras, ATM cameras, tourists' video cameras, and Big Dave's helmet cam.
Actually no, now I think of it, in NZ it's the audio bit which is illegal. Right? So shop security cams only record video, not audio -- I gave a hand with writing some software to interface with a DV security cam set-up, and they mentioned they would record audio but they can't. Wonder how that applies to Mr Miyazaki's videos from his bus-tour around the South Island?
I like it, I like it a lot
On a related note: It would be very easy to start a business stealing exotic cars: just buy a crappy used-Jap import truck, slap some bogus towing business signs on the sides, steal some number plates, then away you go. When I worked in Ponsonby, cars were towed left, right and centre, usually with alarms blaring, and no-one batted an eyelid. Perfect cover for a car-theft ring.[/QUOTE]
Already being done.
David must play fair with the other kids, even the idiots.
I had a look at the Privacy Act and found this:
Sorry about the long read!Originally Posted by Privacy Act 1993
Anyway, on that interpretation I would question why the girl would tape him as I don't see it being connected with a function or activity of the agency. Or is there something I have missed?
Forgive me, as I stated earlier IANAL, but is the `personal information' they are talking about there a recording of their speech? The knee-jerk association I have with personal information is age, demographics, buying habits, all that kind of stuff the marketers lust after. Would an audio recording of somebody fall under personal information?
If that is the case, then yes, I'd say your dead right with the part about `function or activity'. An audio tape is not necessary to clamp and tow cars.
No need for apology, I'm not either. I wasn't sure also, it was worth a look.
I questioned the definition too:Originally Posted by xerxesdaphat
I am guessing that information about an identifiable individual would include manner, tone of voice etc. Again though, I'm no lawyer either and don't know how that'd hold up in court.Originally Posted by Privacy Act 1993
Taxi companies etc routinely record phone calls. I think it's legit if at least one party knows it's being recorded. After all, it's merely an enhanced version of their own memory of the event.
Richard
I would say that'd fall under:
(a) The information is collected for a lawful purpose connected with a
function or activity of the agency; and
(b) The collection of the information is necessary for that purpose.
I don't see the need for a clamper to carry a tape to record people though.
I was wondering, do you have to be licenced to clamp a car or can anyone do it.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks