Schollum and Shipton are to get a cell mate.

**terbang** · 9th August 2007, 08:19

Thats another crooked cop on his way to jail, one more to go..!

**caesius** · 9th August 2007, 08:27

Who's the next one?

**Colapop** · 9th August 2007, 08:28

Dewar has been found guilty. Does that make the earlier verdicts against the three (Schollum, Shipton & Ricards) void because the case/s were proven to have been interferered with? His guilt proves that a crime was commited and that these three men should be retried on that basis?

**terbang** · 9th August 2007, 08:42

Originally Posted by Colapop

Dewar has been found guilty. Does that make the earlier verdicts against the three (Schollum, Shipton & Ricards) void because the case/s were proven to have been interferered with? His guilt proves that a crime was commited and that these three men should be retried on that basis?

Thats a question that I imagine Mr rickards would prefer not to be asked.

**Mom** · 9th August 2007, 08:48

Originally Posted by Colapop

Dewar has been found guilty. Does that make the earlier verdicts against the three (Schollum, Shipton & Ricards) void because the case/s were proven to have been interferered with? His guilt proves that a crime was commited and that these three men should be retried on that basis?

And wouldn't that be a wonderful thing.

**Goblin** · 9th August 2007, 08:51

At long last!!! When I saw this on the late news last night I nearly cried. What a relief Louise and her family must be feeling. Her courage and sheer determination has finally paid off and another scumbag will be locked up.

Good question Colapop!

**Skyryder** · 9th August 2007, 08:58

Whether you are for or against Nichols you have to admit the woman has balls.

It takes some doing to have your life spread all over the media.

At least she can now feel that there are some out there who are prepared to stand up and believe her.

Skyryder

**don rocard** · 9th August 2007, 09:00

Dont think he will be back in the job Monday.Oh dear never mind(wanker).

**Toaster** · 9th August 2007, 09:14

Originally Posted by Colapop

Dewar has been found guilty. Does that make the earlier verdicts against the three (Schollum, Shipton & Ricards) void because the case/s were proven to have been interferered with? His guilt proves that a crime was commited and that these three men should be retried on that basis?

No it doesn't. This verdict (in my understanding) only relates to the inital complaint investigations done way back by Dewar. The subsequent trials done recently will stand and relate to new and proper investigations by CIB into the historic complaints. The fact that no conviction was held against Rickards means they were unable to prove beyond reasonable doubt that he was guilty of the charges against him.

**Colapop** · 9th August 2007, 09:37

How were the 'new' charges affected by Dewar's handling of the original complaints? Could the CIB invvestigation likely have been tainted by the misdirection of the original investigation?

**Coldrider** · 9th August 2007, 09:52

The attachment is not quite on the spot, but is close to the point.
Hopefully it attaches.

**Scouse** · 9th August 2007, 15:08

Dewer must have thought he was untouchable, what a fucking wanker porposely giving evidence that he knew would get a trial ruled as a mistrial.

**peasea** · 9th August 2007, 15:11

Originally Posted by zrxer

Dewer must have thought he was untouchable, what a fucking wanker porposely giving evidence that he knew would get a trial ruled as a mistrial.

A copper thinking he's untouchable?
Aww c'mon now, where'd you get that from?

**Trippin113** · 9th August 2007, 17:23

yayyyy

**jafar** · 9th August 2007, 17:30

Does raise the question. Are these all of them or the tip of the iceberg? If you have 3 rotten ones in one precinct then multiply that by how much to get the rest of the rotten ones