Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: Head on crash, 1959 Chev takes on 2009 Chev, interesting

  1. #1
    Join Date
    1st March 2006 - 18:44
    Bike
    Tuono R , SD900
    Location
    AT HOME
    Posts
    758

    Head on crash, 1959 Chev takes on 2009 Chev, interesting


  2. #2
    Join Date
    17th April 2011 - 14:39
    Bike
    Honda VF750f.
    Location
    Nelson
    Posts
    4,330
    Fuck me, would not of expected that. Technology aye, bloody marvelous. The 59 looks better though.
    For a man is a slave to whatever has mastered him. Keep an open mind, just dont let your brains fall out.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    6th June 2008 - 17:24
    Bike
    The Vixen - K8 GSXR600
    Location
    Behind keybd in The Tron
    Posts
    6,518
    Hmmm...guess I know which one I'd prefer to crash in then. Note the steering column of the '59 poking the driver in the head - about 1.05.
    . “No pleasure is worth giving up for two more years in a rest home.” Kingsley Amis

  4. #4
    Join Date
    4th November 2003 - 13:00
    Bike
    BSA A10
    Location
    Rangiora
    Posts
    12,848
    The guy in the 59 should have got the optional seatbelts
    "If you can make black marks on a straight from the time you turn out of a corner until the braking point of the next turn, then you have enough power."


    Quote Originally Posted by scracha View Post
    Even BP would shy away from cleaning up a sidecar oil spill.
    Quote Originally Posted by Warren Zevon
    Send Lawyers, guns and money, the shit has hit the fan

  5. #5
    Join Date
    13th December 2008 - 18:22
    Bike
    Your mom
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    3,901
    I still don't understand why there are so many idiots who insist that a 50 year old American car will be safer in a crash than a good modern car.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    12th July 2003 - 01:10
    Bike
    Royal Enfield 650 & a V8 or two..
    Location
    The Riviera of the South
    Posts
    14,068
    Front wheel-drive with transvers engine/trans vs an inline six cylinder.

    Which allowed the 09 to skid past the '59 motor and do the damage.

    yeah, seems a fair test.

    But on the whole the '09 is safer - butt-ugly though, ugh, unlike the '59...
    Winding up drongos, foil hat wearers and over sensitive KBers for over 14,000 posts...........
    " Life is not a rehearsal, it's as happy or miserable as you want to make it"

  7. #7
    Join Date
    9th May 2008 - 21:23
    Bike
    A
    Location
    B
    Posts
    2,547
    No surprise in this at all. The concept of a safe passenger cell, sacrificing the metal around it, is hardly new...

  8. #8
    Join Date
    24th September 2008 - 01:32
    Bike
    a shiny new(ish) one
    Location
    Dunedin
    Posts
    3,650
    Quote Originally Posted by unstuck View Post
    Fuck me, would not of expected that. Technology aye, bloody marvelous. The 59 looks better though.
    not anymore it doesnt!
    Quote Originally Posted by scumdog View Post
    Front wheel-drive with transvers engine/trans vs an inline six cylinder.

    Which allowed the 09 to skid past the '59 motor and do the damage.

    yeah, seems a fair test.

    But on the whole the '09 is safer - butt-ugly though, ugh, unlike the '59...
    thats a reasonable point.
    Ive watched arguments between the 'old cars survive a smash better' and the 'new cars survive a crash better' crowds.
    Result is always the same. Old car proponents point out how heavy big and tough old cars are, and point to the usually lower amount of damage, but regardless of how you word it, they can understand that old cars show minimal damage because energy gets transferred to the occupants, meaning less damage but more injury, while new cars utilize crumple zones to absorb energy, maximising damage, and reducing injury.
    But hey, its ok that you're dead because your widow still has a mostly mint '58 with just a little panel damage right?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    9th October 2008 - 15:52
    Bike
    RSV4RR, M109R, ZX10R
    Location
    wellington
    Posts
    6,165
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by scumdog View Post
    Front wheel-drive with transvers engine/trans vs an inline six cylinder.

    Which allowed the 09 to skid past the '59 motor and do the damage.

    yeah, seems a fair test.

    But on the whole the '09 is safer - butt-ugly though, ugh, unlike the '59...
    So you say apple & pears but isnt that the whole point?
    I wouldnt mind seeing the 59 vers 5 star rated little car though. With a masive weight diff the instant reverse effect on little light car would cause some issues to passengers.
    I have evolved as a KB member.Now nothing I say should be taken seriously.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    14th April 2005 - 12:00
    Bike
    1990 Yamaha Virago XV1100
    Location
    Dunedin
    Posts
    3,685
    Quote Originally Posted by slofox View Post
    ...Note the steering column of the '59 poking the driver in the head - about 1.05.
    Pretty obvious why though - at best it was a lap seat-belt only.

    Still, there's no doubt which would be safer to be in.
    Can I believe the magic of your size... (The Shirelles)

  11. #11
    They need to get more Americans into Estima's without seat belts. Looks like it's still pretty easy to die in a car.
    In and out of jobs, running free
    Waging war with society

  12. #12
    Join Date
    13th December 2008 - 18:22
    Bike
    Your mom
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    3,901
    Quote Originally Posted by mossy1200 View Post
    So you say apple & pears but isnt that the whole point?
    I wouldnt mind seeing the 59 vers 5 star rated little car though. With a masive weight diff the instant reverse effect on little light car would cause some issues to passengers.
    I would still rather be inside the small car.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    17th July 2005 - 22:28
    Bike
    Dougcati, Geoff and Suzi
    Location
    Banjo town
    Posts
    10,162
    That particular era Chev had a horrid chassis that folded (poor design, some call it an X framed chassis, not too sure why) and are rather bad in any sort of crash, worse than the models before/after.
    Great bit of marketing... sort of.
    Everyone should be aware that later model cars transfer the energy of a crash down the "chassis rails" and up past the A-pillar (the side intrusion bars can also carry/disperse energy), so it goes without saying that most late model cars are better in crashes than older ones. Except for minor crashes, solid chassis works better in very low speed impacts.

    Pointless really... even a current model Toyota Yaris is "better in a crash" than a VS Commodore.

    Still amusing to see cars be thrown at each other.
    Quote Originally Posted by Paul in NZ View Post
    Ha...Thats true but life is full horrible choices sometimes Merv. Then sometimes just plain stuff happens... and then some more stuff happens.....




    Alloy, stainless and Ti polishing.
    Bling your bike out!
    PM me

  14. #14
    Join Date
    13th July 2011 - 14:47
    Bike
    A Japper
    Location
    In the moment
    Posts
    1,259
    Quote Originally Posted by scumdog View Post
    Front wheel-drive with transvers engine/trans vs an inline six cylinder.

    Which allowed the 09 to skid past the '59 motor and do the damage.

    yeah, seems a fair test.

    But on the whole the '09 is safer - butt-ugly though, ugh, unlike the '59...
    A '59 Ford Customline is it for me.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    24th September 2008 - 01:32
    Bike
    a shiny new(ish) one
    Location
    Dunedin
    Posts
    3,650
    Quote Originally Posted by ducatilover View Post

    Still amusing to see cars be thrown at each other.
    as long as theyre throwing cars at other cars and not bikes, Im not bothered!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •