Page 2 of 55 FirstFirst 12341252 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 820

Thread: Police shoot and kill another person

  1. #16
    Join Date
    19th November 2003 - 18:45
    Bike
    KTM 690 DUKE R
    Location
    Auckland - unavoidably...
    Posts
    6,422
    Quote Originally Posted by caesius View Post
    But the pussy's don't even shoot for the head! Any fool can shoot randomly at the heart, cops should get presents if they manage to get a clear head shot.

    In fact, maybe they could have a quota for them.
    You have shot a pistol in real life I guess then? At a dynamic target a few inches across?

    Well done........... go back to your playstation

  2. #17
    Join Date
    15th March 2004 - 13:00
    Bike
    Austrian and Italian
    Location
    Glenfield, Auckland
    Posts
    4,687
    Quote Originally Posted by Grahameeboy View Post
    Even without knowing full story yet, 4 shots seems excessive if the guy had a hammer..........4 shots surely is 'kill' rather than 'incapacitate'.

    The full story will no doubt reveal itself.
    Hrm, just trying to think of the quote I heard after the Stephen Wallace incident. From a cop I believe : "If they're worth shooting, they're worth shooting twice".

    Finn: No one has to complain. It's standard procedure to refer to the PCA when the cops are involved with a shooting.

  3. #18
    Join Date
    2nd November 2005 - 07:09
    Bike
    2001 DUCATI 900SS
    Location
    Auckland, New Zealand, Ne
    Posts
    4,219
    Quote Originally Posted by sAsLEX View Post
    Very few forces, police or otherwise shoot to maim etc, and rounds are directed at the centre of mass for maximum effect.




    Well that's less than a magazine so that's fair. You fire until the threat is no longer there, if that is 4 or 10 rounds ......

    What do you work as Grahame? Do you undertake firearms training? Do you put yourself on the front line? Do you serve your community?

    Once you do some of those maybe then you can pass judegement.
    I was just making an observation rather than a judgement and did say the full story will reveal.

    I have done weapons training (not guns) and serve my community but not in the Police..............just think that a man with a hammer v guns is a bit much................

    Years ago I was playing pool in a pub with some friends. It was not our local so a local didn't like us playing so decided to attack me without any prior contact......he ended up in hospital...I did Aikido and was cornered and gave up after I realised what I could do.......but what if I had got a gun and shot him..............I would get prosecuted..............not much difference surely.

  4. #19
    Join Date
    22nd December 2006 - 15:47
    Bike
    1990 FZR600
    Location
    HB/Christchurch
    Posts
    102
    Quote Originally Posted by caesius
    But the pussy's don't even shoot for the head! Any fool can shoot randomly at the heart, cops should get presents if they manage to get a clear head shot.

    In fact, maybe they could have a quota for them.
    A wee bit of sarcasm in there.

    Quote Originally Posted by sAsLEX View Post
    You have shot a pistol in real life I guess then? At a dynamic target a few inches across?

    Well done........... go back to your playstation
    I don't have one. God, thanks for pointing out my misfortunes. Now I'll be grumpy all Physics lab.

  5. #20
    Join Date
    19th November 2003 - 18:45
    Bike
    KTM 690 DUKE R
    Location
    Auckland - unavoidably...
    Posts
    6,422
    Quote Originally Posted by Grahameeboy View Post
    I would get prosecuted..............not much difference surely.
    You are allowed to use any force you deem necessary to defend yourself, though there is seldom a case where this will happen whilst you are holding a loaded weapon. Police can carry loaded weapons legally in more situations than you that is one difference. I think i you are attacked unprovoked with many witnesses and you drop the guy permanently you would not get convicted by your peers.

  6. #21
    Join Date
    1st July 2007 - 17:40
    Bike
    my little pony
    Location
    shoebox on middle of road
    Posts
    1,522
    The car was worth more than his life, there is only one side to the story now.
    They were saying the guy may have had more weapons now, sprinkling crap to feed the public till the 'facts' are released.

  7. #22
    Join Date
    2nd November 2005 - 07:09
    Bike
    2001 DUCATI 900SS
    Location
    Auckland, New Zealand, Ne
    Posts
    4,219
    Quote Originally Posted by sAsLEX View Post
    You are allowed to use any force you deem necessary to defend yourself, though there is seldom a case where this will happen whilst you are holding a loaded weapon. Police can carry loaded weapons legally in more situations than you that is one difference. I think i you are attacked unprovoked with many witnesses and you drop the guy permanently you would not get convicted by your peers.
    So a gun v a hammer wealding guy (subject to confirmation) is deemed necessary.

    In the UK the Police are taught Aikido moves which do not involve use of force even against a guy with a hammer or a knife.............there are other ways to deal with situations......and what happened to the tazer??

  8. #23
    Join Date
    11th June 2006 - 15:52
    Bike
    Suzuki GSX1250FA, TGB 50cc moped
    Location
    Horowhenua
    Posts
    1,879
    hehe, maybe it will turn out to have been his own car.. that would be rich.. shot for smashing up your own car
    David must play fair with the other kids, even the idiots.

  9. #24
    Join Date
    19th November 2003 - 18:45
    Bike
    KTM 690 DUKE R
    Location
    Auckland - unavoidably...
    Posts
    6,422
    Quote Originally Posted by caesius View Post

    I don't have one. God, thanks for pointing out my misfortunes. Now I'll be grumpy all Physics lab.
    You should really go to a club and give one a try. Will highlight how bullshit most movies/ games / pop culture is.

    Here is mine..... .well kinda


  10. #25
    Join Date
    19th November 2003 - 18:45
    Bike
    KTM 690 DUKE R
    Location
    Auckland - unavoidably...
    Posts
    6,422
    Quote Originally Posted by Grahameeboy View Post
    So a gun v a hammer wealding guy (subject to confirmation) is deemed necessary.

    In the UK the Police are taught Aikido moves which do not involve use of force even against a guy with a hammer or a knife.............there are other ways to deal with situations......and what happened to the tazer??
    Maybe they weren't carrying the tazer after all the public outcry over there use!

    Can they win at all?

    Keeping justice with flowers and hugs is not going to work. HTFU. If you decide to be a prat and go threatening cops pause a little and think of the consequences.

  11. #26
    Join Date
    29th March 2006 - 21:15
    Bike
    Triumph
    Location
    Easy Street
    Posts
    715
    Quote Originally Posted by Grahameeboy View Post
    So a gun v a hammer wealding guy (subject to confirmation) is deemed necessary.

    and what happened to the tazer??
    I wondered that too(what if the guy wasnt a pee head but a schitzophrenic or something??)will wait for the FACTS to emerge..
    <span style=font-family: Century Gothic><font size=4><font color=DarkOrchid>Live and let live</font></font></span>

  12. #27
    Join Date
    11th April 2005 - 21:13
    Bike
    Big ol' Hornet.
    Location
    RottenVegas.
    Posts
    2,201
    Quote Originally Posted by sAsLEX View Post
    You are allowed to use any force you deem necessary to defend yourself, though there is seldom a case where this will happen whilst you are holding a loaded weapon. Police can carry loaded weapons legally in more situations than you that is one difference. I think i you are attacked unprovoked with many witnesses and you drop the guy permanently you would not get convicted by your peers.
    Tell that to Mr Chef.
    Do not handicap your children by making their lives easy.
    Heinlein

    MotoTT Trackdays

  13. #28
    Join Date
    2nd November 2005 - 07:09
    Bike
    2001 DUCATI 900SS
    Location
    Auckland, New Zealand, Ne
    Posts
    4,219
    Quote Originally Posted by sAsLEX View Post
    Maybe they weren't carrying the tazer after all the public outcry over there use!

    Can they win at all?

    Keeping justice with flowers and hugs is not going to work. HTFU. If you decide to be a prat and go threatening cops pause a little and think of the consequences.
    I agree the Police get a hard public opinion ride.

    But when did being a pratt mean you deserved to get shot. I just don't think being shot is a reasonable consequence if the story so far is true.

    I mean when they catch a serial killer, do they shoot them there and then because they may be in danger? But a pratt gets shot...who was the more dangerous............

  14. #29
    Join Date
    2nd November 2005 - 07:09
    Bike
    2001 DUCATI 900SS
    Location
    Auckland, New Zealand, Ne
    Posts
    4,219
    Quote Originally Posted by u4ea View Post
    I wondered that too(what if the guy wasnt a pee head but a schitzophrenic or something??)will wait for the FACTS to emerge..
    Exactly right.........................

  15. #30
    Join Date
    22nd February 2005 - 21:35
    Bike
    Honda
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    225
    Quote Originally Posted by Grahameeboy View Post
    So a gun v a hammer wealding guy (subject to confirmation) is deemed necessary.
    What would you rather they do? Get to the scene, see the guy has a hammer so all run off to get hammers themselves so they can have a 'fair' fight in which the offender has just as much chance of 'winning' and killing them?

    Quote Originally Posted by Grahameeboy View Post
    In the UK the Police are taught Aikido moves which do not involve use of force even against a guy with a hammer or a knife.............there are other ways to deal with situations......and what happened to the tazer??
    What aload of absolute crap, Police in the U.K don't respond to offenders with bats and knives unarmed, they go in armed exactly the same way we do. Many forces have armed response vehicles which are designated for just such a role so I have no idea where you get your information from.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •