The Zrex has a 17 litre tank. Onto reserve at about 250km (plus or minus), breathing fumes at about 300km.
The Zrex has a 17 litre tank. Onto reserve at about 250km (plus or minus), breathing fumes at about 300km.
"Standing on your mother's corpse you told me that you'd wait forever." [Bryan Adams: Summer of 69]
Got ya there - 80,000kms, but we have had to repaint the tank once.Originally Posted by scumdog
I normally get 270kms to reserve, and 300 is safe, fill up with 20L 15kms/L That is all commuting, and I'm not nice to it either.
Its a 24L tank, one tap and maori reserve.
On the open road, I'll happily get 350kms to reserve, maybe 400 to a fill.
20kms/L
Queiro voya todo Europa con mi moto.... pero no tengo suficiente tiempo o dinero.....
1991 GSX250s Katana replica.
17 litre tank. 3 L is the reserve.
I get between 200-220 km , before I hit the reserve
I've been getting 200km pretty reliably before hitting reserve lately. Usually at about 220km I fill up with 15 litres. It's mainly commuting, so maybe touring would bet a bit better mileage.
Are you sure? - I assume it IS a bike you're talking about?Originally Posted by Magua
My 302 V8 does just under that on a trip!!!!![]()
Winding up drongos, foil hat wearers and over sensitive KBers for over 14,000 posts...........![]()
" Life is not a rehearsal, it's as happy or miserable as you want to make it"
]Originally Posted by scumdog
The zxr got up to 53,000 before it had the tank replaced.
My brother only got about 50km's out of the gpx's tank.
on my gsxr400 i get 13.9Km/L. its a little rich on the bottom end but im not entirely sure thats the whole story. its got an arrows exhaust and god only knows about the jetting. its a 16litre tank so that make hmmm 220 km's to a tank including the reserve.
Ermm this is the thing I don't understand... I also have a Honda jazz (cage) and that does around 18~19km/L putting around auckland. Why does a car get better mileage than a bike? Even when the bike is like 1/4 the weight...?Originally Posted by カワサキキド
I did 200 km on $6 ... a bit around town in chch and then highway speeds back...
really gotta change that rear sprocket though to get a nicer top end speed
I'm not sure if it's a valid comparison to make, but if you compare the power output of your bike - 33hp or 24.27kW iirc from 250cc displacement, with that to the Honda Jazz which makes 81 kW from 1500cc displacement, then if your car had the same power/displacement ratio as your bike it'd be a 145kW fire breathing Honda Jazz.Originally Posted by Zapf
Maybe it's not an entirely valid comparison between a 2 pot and a 4 pot engine, and it's quite possible that these calculations aren't scalable with displacement, but it would suggest to me that your bike is more highly tuned than your car, which I would assume would account for the higher fuel consumption.
Technology differences would be a factor as well. The VTR is a twin carb setup (iirc) while the Jazz is a fuel injected variable valved thingy, which would tend to increase it's efficency.
I'd think that from a marketing perspective, Honda would be more concerned with fuel consumption figures in selling a car than they would be in selling a bike.
Can anyone offer any alternative perspectives / debunk my logic on this?
Most likely that will be the cause. They are the same engine just with different tuning. Part of the problem is also that they geared it for 250kph, so putting along at 100 is over 5,000rpm whereas the F4 would be sitting on 4,000rpm.Originally Posted by celticno6
I'm hoping to get a new injection chip before the Big50 ride at New Years so that is meant to give an extra 10% or so.
I don't mind paying for so much gas but the reduced range is a hassle. (sounds like a good reason to trade it on a 1000cc f4!)
Matt Thompson
About 16 km/l around town, and up to 20 km/l with open road riding.
(And about 13 km/l when running two cylinders with a cracked ignition coil...)
Look, it's an itsy bitsy Bandit.
Fuel injection can make a big difference - for example, the SV650 reviewed in KB was making better mileage than my Bandit 250, depsite the fact twins are normally greedier than fours economy-wise.Originally Posted by Zapf
Also look at how hard you're working the respective engines. How quick do you get to the speed limit from the lights on your bike, versus your car, for example? And don't forget that a well-designed car has a much lower coefficient of drag than all but the most aerodynamic bikes, so cruising at a given speed may require less work by the engine.
Look, it's an itsy bitsy Bandit.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks