The white man's burden

[Dave Lobster]

How would he do, or indeed how would we fare, if we had to undergo a test prepared by African tribesmen around things with which they are familiar?

How would he fare against a black person from a London ghetto, who has spent most of his life without a father figure, but with a free education, and who can't even point to afwica on a map?

Unless he's got some pretty good evidence, he'd have kept his gob shut. Evidence you wont see on the BBC, which has far more none white people in it than the national demographic.

[davereid]

• obvious satire / humour
• blatant anti-racism opinions
• a few willing to debate the idea on a scientific basis from both sides

Labelling people racist because they dare talk about subjects containing race issues is ludicrous PC dribble. The one or two posts in this whole thread that are a little derogatory are from people who take the piss on any and every subject.

The most racist of all the posts in this thread is the original - yours.

BLING ! Three reactions to this thread really...

1..the jokers,
2..those who say " I agree / disagree buts whats your evidence
3..the worst..those who say, you're a racist asehole for even daring consider it - the party line condemns discussion of the subject, you will be burned at the stake, of course the earth is the center of the universe !

[Skyryder]

I sometimes wonder about that myself.
A shitload of my female 'clients' have way more kids (and criminal minded ones at that) than the honest working types - o.k. maybe these 'clients' don't have all the kids anymore 'cos welfare has taken some off them but generally a lot who have had a lot of kids bloody well shouldn't - even if just for their kids sake.

It's an interesting hypothesis. On one hand is theory that ones position in society is based on intelligence, which if I am not mistaken is what you are alluding too. The other is that intellegence is not based on social position, which is where I tend to come from. Some intelligent people do come from the lower echelons of society. Two spring to mind. Banks and Keys. Mind you there are some who would dispute this unfortunately I'm not one although I could make a case based on their politics alone.

I came across a site that had the IQ for two different sections of society and their economic position in it. It turned out that those with the higher IQ dominated the society that they lived in. This could have been based on their higher education or equally based on what your post alludes to: that the higher intelligence dominates the society because of their higher IQ.

At the end of the day each argument based on racial IQ vis a vis superior or inferior can be disputed with arguements to support any theory for or against.

It's all just an 'educated' guess one way or the other.

Skyryder