Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 36

Thread: "Speed police can't hide"

  1. #1
    Join Date
    31st July 2004 - 12:00
    Bike
    Sweet Fcuk All
    Location
    Transient
    Posts
    1,929

    "Speed police can't hide"

    Dominion Post, 19/10/04

    (I was going to type it out word for word, but I have to get back to work, so here's a concise version.)

    Police officers can no linger hide in bushes, or camouflage themselves in order to catch speeding drivers.
    Police bosses have issued a tough new speed enforcement guide. The move follows the deployment of mobile speed cameras, an increase in the number of speeding fines issued and a spate of negative publicity on the lengths police were going to catch speedsters.

    Key point: Police vehicles or officers' uniforms may not be hidden. All speed measuring devices are to be employed in an overt manner. The only exception is unmarked police vehicles used for speed enforcement.

    Dom post revealed in April, 14 unmarked police cars are being rotated around the country to target dangerous drivers. guidelines also spell out how discretion should be applied. Other then in exceptional circumstances, anyone driving 11km/h over the limit, or 6km/h in heavy vehicles, will be ticketed. Drivers not exceeding these limits should not be ticketed unless their speed poses a risk to public safety.

    Just FYI

  2. #2
    Join Date
    11th May 2004 - 21:30
    Bike
    2001 Suzuki GSF250V
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    263
    Quote Originally Posted by StoneChucker
    Key point: Police vehicles or officers' uniforms may not be hidden. All speed measuring devices are to be employed in an overt manner. The only exception is unmarked police vehicles used for speed enforcement.
    Good. If the point is deterrence, visibility of the cops does more to deter than lurking in bushes.

    Quote Originally Posted by StoneChucker
    guidelines also spell out how discretion should be applied. Other then in exceptional circumstances, anyone driving 11km/h over the limit, or 6km/h in heavy vehicles, will be ticketed. Drivers not exceeding these limits should not be ticketed unless their speed poses a risk to public safety.
    Yeah, and we'll still hear the bleating from the "111 is only 1 km/h over, where's the discretion!?" crowd...
    Look, it's an itsy bitsy Bandit.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    12th August 2004 - 09:31
    Bike
    2013 EX300SE
    Location
    Top of the Gorge
    Posts
    1,511
    Quote Originally Posted by rodgerd
    Good. If the point is deterrence, visibility of the cops does more to deter than lurking in bushes.

    Couldn't agree more. Can't be a deterrent if you can't see them. There's nothing like seeing the boys in blue out on the roads to make you watch your driving.

    Yeah, and we'll still hear the bleating from the "111 is only 1 km/h over, where's the discretion!?" crowd...
    Yep, seems that 10km/h is a reasonable leeway, just have to watch those overtakes.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    1st February 2004 - 18:17
    Bike
    RC36, WR, RS250, GSXR1000, Duke250, IZH
    Location
    Hamilton
    Posts
    632
    "hey officer, You weren't being overt, coming over the crest of that hill like that" think that'll work?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    3rd October 2004 - 17:35
    Posts
    6,390
    I though on overtaking you can go 120 (in a 100 zone)?


    Does this mean if a cop is hiding and he tickets me I can say "you're not allowed to hide so you cant give me a ticket" Or is it going to be "we're not allowed to hide but you're still going to get the ticket for being and arrogant son of gun"?
    Then I could get a Kb Tshirt, move to Timaru and become a full time crossdressing faggot

  6. #6
    Join Date
    8th June 2004 - 12:00
    Bike
    BMW K1200R
    Location
    Under a bridge downtown
    Posts
    1,208
    Quote Originally Posted by renegade master
    I though on overtaking you can go 120 (in a 100 zone)?


    Can you report back to us your sucess with this though(t)?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    3rd October 2004 - 17:35
    Posts
    6,390
    Well, I don’t go over 100 so I don’t need to over take. But I thought the overtaking was 120, at least that’s what my driving instructor told me (I think)
    Then I could get a Kb Tshirt, move to Timaru and become a full time crossdressing faggot

  8. #8
    Join Date
    3rd October 2004 - 17:35
    Posts
    6,390
    And the fact is everyone travells at 110 so if your overtaking a car or bike thats doing 110 you're not goning to get very far, And often the room you have to overtake is not long enough for a slow overtake, Granted if they are going 110 you shouldn't need to overtake but I'm guessing thats not going to stop people.
    Then I could get a Kb Tshirt, move to Timaru and become a full time crossdressing faggot

  9. #9
    Join Date
    25th March 2004 - 17:22
    Bike
    RZ496/Street 765RS/GasGas/ etc etc
    Location
    Wellington. . ok the hutt
    Posts
    21,260
    Blog Entries
    2

    Wot I rekon.

    It is a pretty loose urban myth that 120 is ok for overtaking.

    Problem is when you are following people, there is a cretin at the front who will do 80 or less, have a line of cars behind him & speed up when he gets to a passing lane so you have to REALLY break the law to get past, then slows right down when the lanes merge.

    Cops are often seen at the end of over taking areas for this reason.

    The psychology of this person in front is either they don’t feel safe driving faster on single lane roads & do when it gets straight & open, or more likely they have small penises & this is the only way they get to control others so they speed up to stop people passing & slow down when they can’t.

    Drives people crazy, if everyone could do a consistent 100k on the open road then there would be a lot less crazy overtaking manoeuvres road rage & risk taking. & probably a lot less desire to speed to make up for lost time & frustration.

    Don’t expect the LTSA to be pushing this idea in the near future . . .

    Though they did surprise me with the ‘brake on the straight’ adds & more regular eyesight checks for oldies ideas (I really believe people should have to get their eyes checked more often to keep a licence) so am prepared for them to surprise me again by doing something sensible.

    Bring it on.
    Don't you look at my accountant.
    He's the only one I've got.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    3rd July 2003 - 12:00
    Bike
    Scorpio, XL1200N
    Location
    forests of azure
    Posts
    9,398
    Quote Originally Posted by F5 Dave
    ... if everyone could do a consistent 100k on the open road then there would be a lot less crazy overtaking manoeuvres road rage & risk taking.
    I have personally observed on longish cage drives that, even taking into account my usual self-enforced 110kph ceiling, I am always travelling faster than everybody else on the road, bar the occasional Porsche, WRX, et cetera zipping into the distance.

    Most drivers certainly average far less than 100kph on our open roads, even though many are quite driveable in a modern car at the speed limit.

    I suspect that a driver education programme pushing a philosophy of concentration and attention to vehicle control would result in a lessening of high-speed silliness by frustrated would-be passers; the median speed would creep toward the actual open-road limit as drivers abrogated their need to stay 20-30kph under it while they drank their Diet Coke, twiddled with the volume on their Dire Straits albums and handed chewy alligator lollies to the toddlers in the back.

    [Edit: Mmmm. Chewy alligator lollies...]
    kiwibiker is full of love, an disrespect.
    - mikey

  11. #11
    Join Date
    11th May 2004 - 21:30
    Bike
    2001 Suzuki GSF250V
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    263
    Quote Originally Posted by F5 Dave
    Though they did surprise me with the ‘brake on the straight’ adds & more regular eyesight checks for oldies ideas (I really believe people should have to get their eyes checked more often to keep a licence) so am prepared for them to surprise me again by doing something sensible.
    Sadly, among Harry Ds more sensible ideas is that he's bowing to the almighty voting power of the oldies in this area. Despite the fact that crashes and fatalities involving and caused by older drivers are spiraling up relative to other age groups, there are likely to be further, agressive roll-backs on mandatory retesting for elderly drivers and special licenses for within 10km of home, with relaxed test conditions/fitness applied (great comfort if you get killed by some half-blind moron, I'm sure, that they were within 10 km of home...)
    Look, it's an itsy bitsy Bandit.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    30th March 2004 - 11:00
    Bike
    2001 RC46
    Location
    Norfshaw
    Posts
    10,455
    Blog Entries
    17
    Quote Originally Posted by rodgerd
    Sadly, among Harry Ds more sensible ideas is that he's bowing to the almighty voting power of the oldies in this area. Despite the fact that crashes and fatalities involving and caused by older drivers are spiraling up relative to other age groups, there are likely to be further, agressive roll-backs on mandatory retesting for elderly drivers and special licenses for within 10km of home, with relaxed test conditions/fitness applied (great comfort if you get killed by some half-blind moron, I'm sure, that they were within 10 km of home...)
    All part of the general malaise that views driving as a right, not as a privilege and serious responsibility.:spudwhat:

    My mother drives OK (she's 74), but I reckon she'd be better off financially if she used taxis instead of owning a car.
    ... and that's what I think.

    Or summat.


    Or maybe not...

    Dunno really....


  13. #13
    Join Date
    25th March 2004 - 17:22
    Bike
    RZ496/Street 765RS/GasGas/ etc etc
    Location
    Wellington. . ok the hutt
    Posts
    21,260
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by jrandom
    . . . albums and handed chewy alligator lollies to the toddlers in the back.

    [Edit: Mmmm. Chewy alligator lollies...]

    When I have kids they will never even find out there are such things as Chewy Alligator lollies.

    I’ll just cough or say I’m chewing tobacco. Little buggers would eat ‘em all, I’m sure.
    Don't you look at my accountant.
    He's the only one I've got.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    10th December 2003 - 13:00
    Bike
    Shanksters Pony
    Location
    NZ
    Posts
    2,647
    Quote Originally Posted by renegade master
    I though on overtaking you can go 120 (in a 100 zone)?
    Theres this thing, its called the road code. Ever seen it? Ever read it?

  15. #15
    Join Date
    10th December 2003 - 13:00
    Bike
    Shanksters Pony
    Location
    NZ
    Posts
    2,647
    Quote Originally Posted by StoneChucker
    Key point: Police vehicles or officers' uniforms may not be hidden. All speed measuring devices are to be employed in an overt manner. The only exception is unmarked police vehicles used for speed enforcement.
    I reckon its a good move. An overt presence is best as a deterant and it will help to shut the whingers up too.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •