Got offered a Kawasaki 400 to-day..
1982. reg on hold.and no wof.
Apparently its in reasoable cond.still goes
Guy said is was a 440...but dont think Kawasaki made a 440
400 i think.......6 speed.......is that right.??
all offers considered..
Got offered a Kawasaki 400 to-day..
1982. reg on hold.and no wof.
Apparently its in reasoable cond.still goes
Guy said is was a 440...but dont think Kawasaki made a 440
400 i think.......6 speed.......is that right.??
all offers considered..
My cousin had a Z440. No idea what year etc. There I've shared everything I know about them...
440LTD? like this:
6 speed, 184kg, 27hp, 154km/h
http://www.bikez.com/motorcycles/kaw...0_ltd_1982.php
God I had a Kawa 400 somthing back in the day (1990 I think) and oh my so bad I cant for the life of me remember exactly what it wasand trying to find some photos, but it was a great little bike. Was the first bike I ever did the Coro loop on (also back in the day).
Didnt look like the one posted in the pic though, but I remember it was a minter. Will try and find a photo
View my new blog at www.girlybikes.blogspot.com
Perfection is not something you should ever attain, but something to always strive for. For if we actually achieve our idea of perfection, is it then any longer perfect?
Looks a bit different to my cousin's. That one's got more of the "custom" style to it. Must have been a few different variants.
Will go and have a look at this bike
Check out the WOF and REG
Doesnt really seem like me though
Would be a real cheap comuter. KZ440LTDs(Kawasakis Cruiser models) were one of the first bikes to have rubber belt final drives. The cooking model (kz440) has been known to lug sidecars to umentionable parts of this fair country of ours.
Piece of junk mate.....stay away
yeah think you are right,,,,
As they say "One mans trash is anothers treasure"
Claimed hp is more like 35/41hp for later 400/440s
Kwaka twins forum-
http://www.armbell.com/forum/index.p...1&mforum=kz400
A hell of a lot of usefull info here-
http://www.kz400.com/
Last edited by Bonez; 18th November 2007 at 05:39. Reason: Corrected hp figure
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks