Puddytat, besides being a bit racistic I must say I agree with most of your post. There is one exception though.
...I think you can only speak for yourself on that count.Originally Posted by puddytat
Homo Sapiens Vulgaris
Puddytat, besides being a bit racistic I must say I agree with most of your post. There is one exception though.
...I think you can only speak for yourself on that count.
It is preferential to refrain from the utilisation of grandiose verbiage in the circumstance that your intellectualisation can be expressed using comparatively simplistic lexicological entities. (...such as the word fuck.)
Remember your humanity, and forget the rest. - Joseph Rotblat
wasn't me!
er......wake up buddy, that was my point!
But seriously....for the record, not all mammels had the need to be domesticated, mules for example???? hmmmmmm???? wake up dude!
Hardcore Biker
ffs its mammals!!!!!!!
Forum whore
Animals have been domesticated and farmed for ages. They are a sustainable crop. If harvesting whales was sustainable - life span, breeding stocks, genetic diversity and their harvest did not effect the ocean's ecosystem - I wouldn't give a shit how many got slaughtered.
I'd still have a problem with the Japs trailing halfway round the world to get them though. Make sure you can survive on your on patch of turf before you go off stealing apples from someone else's orchard, so to speak.
As far as "inhumane torture" - ever seen a farm animal slaughtered? I know you have Flame, so what's the difference? Up until a few short years ago cattle were shot with pneumatic guns at the works. That apparently was inhumane torture.
They shall not grow old as we that are left grow old.
Age shall not weary them nor the years condemn.
At the going down of the sun and in the evening,
we will remember them
wasn't me!
the difference been the intention of a captive bolt, or electric forceps, or bullet is to give an efficient end to the nervous system sensing pain/followed by a complete termination if nesessary. Of course sometimes it can go wrong, and doesn't give the desired effect, however....the intention is to cull the animal as humane as is possible.
Have you ever had a fish served up to you on a plate with it's meat cooked, but body/gills still gasping for the oxygen it receives through the water?????? I think there is obviously quite a difference in what different people perceive as a humane vs prolonged death. Which would you rather have????
wasn't me!
who cares about spelling? or is it spilling? or spulling for all I care! Diction doesn't make a person.
FFS......should read 'for fark sake' by the way!
ArseBiscuit
Domesticated? Oh fetch my slippers from beside the fire Daisy......
Forum whore
Nope never had fish cooked liked that. How is that done? (serious question)
My point is that there are many ways that many animals are killed and eaten around the world. If a method is considered ok in one country or culture but not in another does that make it wrong?
They shall not grow old as we that are left grow old.
Age shall not weary them nor the years condemn.
At the going down of the sun and in the evening,
we will remember them
Ta
Never heard of it in this country, but in Japan the fish is scooped out of a tank, fileted alive, said fillets are then seered and delivered to you beside a gasping fish with no sides.
Your other question is one of morality, as is most of this thread I guess.
Is it acceptable to sell used womans nickers through vending machines? Quite common in Japan.
This thread is as informative as the inside of a toilet bowl while you're having a chuck, nothing good to be seen, but ya dont wanna look away just incase.
ArseBiscuit
You might be able to tell if you have bowel cancer. worth checking.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks