Au contraire, sir.
Have you done much pistol shooting? An inch-sized grouping off the bench at 25 yards is quite achievable with most quality 6" revolvers, but a Glock won't do anything like that straight out of the box.
If the subject interests you, pop into Sportways Gunshed in Mt Eden sometime and have a chat with Mike, who won the NZ Service Pistol Nationals in 2006 with a Ruger GP100.
Also, while a Glock is undoubtedly the best choice in terms of automatic pistol reliability, the good old double-action revolver simply cannot be beaten for "goes bang every time" confidence in harsh conditions.
kiwibiker is full of love, an disrespect.
- mikey
Yes, a lot in a previous life and recently at Brookby. Actually looking at taking it up again.
In the context of shooting moving African's, (they're pretty quick on their feet if you look at Olympic records) I would feel more confident with a glock than a revolver. However, tied to a post at 25 yards, a rock would do to.
I've had to put my plans of becoming a competitive shooter on hold due to generally crazy levels of shit going on this year and next, but do keep in touch if you manage to get things off the ground vis-a-vis pistol shooting.
Yes, a G17 with a 30-round mag would certainly be the way to go in a target-rich environment.
kiwibiker is full of love, an disrespect.
- mikey
, (they're pretty quick on their feet if you look at Olympic records)
They are quick allright....
think they spend a lot of there time running away from lions
Personally Id go for the .45 Colt 1911, mainly because its bloody good accuracy wise and stopping power is pretty decent, as well as being one of the most reliable semi autos around. 9mm is a waste of time imho.
Never let your enemy see your emotions, for it is the one weapon they will value most.
Wheel guns.
They are ok as a back-up. Primary is different.
TOP QUOTE: “The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people’s money.”
Yehaaaaa! The ol' .45ACP vs 9mm FAWOMFT!
Hasn't quite been around as long as the the Catholic vs Protestant one but is older than the Linux vs Windoze debate.
How about we both get given a strict budget for ammo and we'll see who's more accurate in 6 months, eh? A nine-mil in the centre of the chest is far more effective than a .45 in the shoulder or the forearm...
If you want to use anything that costs more to feed than a nine mil, start with a nine mil, burn up shit-loads of cheap ammo until you're accurate and then get the other weapon and but a couple of hundred rounds through it - you'd already be accurate and all you'd have to do is get the feel for the new weapon, it'd cost you less than a few thousand rounds of the calibre of your choice - hardly sounds like a nine mil is a "waste of time" to me.
Unless, of course, you're one of those "The .45ACP/.357Mag/.44Mag/.454 Casull/.50AE/whatever is a magic wand and will kill a person if they look at it" idiots who doesn't believe that bullet placement has any bearing on the matter.
Motorbike Camping for the win!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks