For Hitcher

**bungbung** · 14th January 2008, 07:36

Your'll needing these's

**Hitcher** · 14th January 2008, 08:02

Your generosity has deeply moved the BDOTGNZA.

**vifferman** · 14th January 2008, 08:10

Originally Posted by bungbung

Your'll needing these's

Kewl!
Tadpoles!

But..er...um.. why are they all right-handed taddies?

**bungbung** · 14th January 2008, 08:12

Originally Posted by vifferman

Kewl!
Tadpoles!

But..er...um.. why are they all right-handed taddies?

You can use them both ways:

Sometime's up here or the other way,s at the bottom,,

**007XX** · 14th January 2008, 08:16

Originally Posted by bungbung

You can use them both ways:

Sometime's up here or the other way,s at the bottom,,

Taddies with an ambivalent sexuality...Hmmmmm, one does wonder if we should pronounce them hermaphrodites?!?

**vifferman** · 14th January 2008, 08:44

Originally Posted by 007XX

Taddies with an ambivalent sexuality

I dunno, but it made me re-read bung bung's reply, and when you start putting a sexual slant on things, all of a sudden, " Sometime's up here or the other way,s at the bottom,," looks VERY dodgy.

**Hitcher** · 14th January 2008, 08:55

There is no such thing as an ambivalent or confused apostrophe. Speech marks, however, go both ways...

**MSTRS:Me** · 14th January 2008, 09:17

Originally Posted by Hitcher

Speech marks, however, go both ways...

AC
DC
She's got some other lover
As well as me
....

**007XX** · 14th January 2008, 09:46

Originally Posted by vifferman

I dunno, but it made me re-read bung bung's reply, and when you start putting a sexual slant on things, all of a sudden, " Sometime's up here or the other way,s at the bottom,," looks VERY dodgy.

AHA...another convert :wooohoo: !!! Welcome to my mind...

Originally Posted by Hitcher

There is no such thing as an ambivalent or confused apostrophe.

Tsk, tsk...There is whenever placed in the hands of the confused (as in a few Kbers' which shall remain anonymous

).