As I said earlier "And if they've accepted that, I wonder if they've discounted (or been told to discount) the claim that Miller said those words? Or possibly that they've accepted them as a warning, rather than final words before firing the bolt?"
Further wondering is if they have to discount the words, if the wife and kid did not hear them? Then it would be one man's word against another, so cannot be proven and so not admissible evidence?
Bookmarks