Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 39 of 39

Thread: Sideslipping a Pitts?

  1. #31
    Join Date
    5th December 2006 - 18:22
    Bike
    2000 Honda CBR600F4, RG50/GL145 Bucket
    Location
    Whitby, Wellington
    Posts
    2,009
    Quote Originally Posted by marty View Post
    or fly a 'spitfire' approach - kind of like a glide approach flying a curving/descending base/finals from abeam the upwind threshold.
    Called the "Buzz and Break". I think it's 1,500' over the centre of the field and if you do it right you touch nothing until touchdown. Have tried it in the sim but never in the air. Can't do it in the sim, no spatial awareness
    Last edited by Grub; 11th February 2008 at 21:05. Reason: centre of field, not upwind end

  2. #32
    Join Date
    5th December 2006 - 18:22
    Bike
    2000 Honda CBR600F4, RG50/GL145 Bucket
    Location
    Whitby, Wellington
    Posts
    2,009
    Quote Originally Posted by Jantar View Post
    and its also a good way to center a thermal with engine back to idle.
    Only had that once and it was awesome! Got on the wave just approaching Fairlie/Burkes Pass in ZK-CXN. Throttle closed and going up at 1,500ft/min to the transition alt, had to call CHCH Control and grovel. Oh and we were at MAUW on leaving NZCH so we weren't light and fluffy by any means.

    Didn't last long though did it ... a wave's a wave and there's no free lunch.

  3. #33
    Join Date
    29th January 2005 - 11:00
    Bike
    2006 Suzuki GSX-R750 K6
    Location
    Te Puke
    Posts
    2,970
    Quote Originally Posted by Jantar View Post
    The C172 is not permitted to side slip with flap applied. That doesn't mean they won't do it though, just that the manufacturer doesn't approve. It is a perfectly acceptable manouver to reduce height should the flaps fail, and its also a good way to center a thermal with engine back to idle.
    Been bloody ages since I flew a 172, but from memory the placard says "avoid slips with flap extended", not that it's a big no-no. Bit like "avoid walking into the rotating propeller". Just the Americans covering their butts
    Member, sem fiddy appreciation society


    Quote Originally Posted by PrincessBandit View Post
    I find it ironic that the incredibly rude personal comments about Les were made by someone bearing an astonishing resemblance to a Monica Lewinsky dress accessory.

    Quote Originally Posted by PrincessBandit View Post
    All was good until I realised that having 105kg of man sliding into my rear was a tad uncomfortable after a while

  4. #34
    Join Date
    21st August 2004 - 12:00
    Bike
    2017 Suzuki Dl1000
    Location
    Picton
    Posts
    5,177
    Quote Originally Posted by Grub View Post
    Only had that once and it was awesome! Got on the wave just approaching Fairlie/Burkes Pass in ZK-CXN. Throttle closed and going up at 1,500ft/min to the transition alt, had to call CHCH Control and grovel. Oh and we were at MAUW on leaving NZCH so we weren't light and fluffy by any means.

    Didn't last long though did it ... a wave's a wave and there's no free lunch.
    I did one flight from Omaka to Alex. Flight time was just over 4 hours, but the Tacho time was just over 2 hours. Our club charges on tacho, not hobbes.
    Time to ride

  5. #35
    Join Date
    5th December 2006 - 18:22
    Bike
    2000 Honda CBR600F4, RG50/GL145 Bucket
    Location
    Whitby, Wellington
    Posts
    2,009
    Quote Originally Posted by Pussy View Post
    Been bloody ages since I flew a 172, but from memory the placard says "avoid slips with flap extended", not that it's a big no-no. Bit like "avoid walking into the rotating propeller". Just the Americans covering their butts
    From memory wasn't it the slip blanketing the tailplane with flaps on the reason they canned the 40deg flap setting on 172's? There's something in the little gray cells about that - I'm pretty sure that they attributed a few accidents to that setting and so as Pussy says, took the product-liability low ground.

    They're a horrid aircraft anyway, just like american cars ... all soft and mushy with 1950's technlogy still being built.

  6. #36
    Join Date
    22nd August 2003 - 22:33
    Bike
    ...
    Location
    NZ
    Posts
    4,205
    Blog Entries
    5
    no it's not a buzz and break. that's a way of washing off speed and joining the circuit and looking at the runway all at the same time.

  7. #37
    Join Date
    1st November 2005 - 08:18
    Bike
    F-117.
    Location
    Banana Republic of NZ
    Posts
    7,048
    so you either fly in like this /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/============, sideslip in, or fly a 'spitfire' approach - kind of like a glide approach flying a curving/descending base/finals from abeam the upwind threshold.
    Quote Originally Posted by Edbear View Post
    Doh! Run that by me again...?
    The nose of a Spitfire is quite long and the pilot cannot see ahead and down...
    So a long, straight in, approach will leave the pilot guessing where anything (straight ahead) is.
    Marty has "drawn" a zig-zag approach so that the pilot can see to the side, and then straighten up just before touchdown.
    Alternative #2 is the sideslip approach.
    The spitfire approach is a long, descending, curve. This allows the pilot to see the runway out the side of the windscreen throughout the approach and then straighten up for touchdown.

    Taxiing the aircraft requires constant weaving from side to side. Think about this and then relate it to the approach.
    Clear as mud?
    TOP QUOTE: “The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people’s money.”

  8. #38
    Join Date
    29th October 2005 - 16:12
    Bike
    Had a 2007 Suzuki C50T Boulevard
    Location
    Orewa
    Posts
    5,852
    Quote Originally Posted by Swoop View Post
    so you either fly in like this /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/============, sideslip in, or fly a 'spitfire' approach - kind of like a glide approach flying a curving/descending base/finals from abeam the upwind threshold.

    The nose of a Spitfire is quite long and the pilot cannot see ahead and down...
    So a long, straight in, approach will leave the pilot guessing where anything (straight ahead) is.
    Marty has "drawn" a zig-zag approach so that the pilot can see to the side, and then straighten up just before touchdown.
    Alternative #2 is the sideslip approach.
    The spitfire approach is a long, descending, curve. This allows the pilot to see the runway out the side of the windscreen throughout the approach and then straighten up for touchdown.

    Taxiing the aircraft requires constant weaving from side to side. Think about this and then relate it to the approach.
    Clear as mud?

    Ah, cool, thanks! Even I could understand that!
    You don't get to be an old dog without learning a few tricks.
    Shorai Powersports batteries are very trick!

  9. #39
    Join Date
    22nd August 2003 - 22:33
    Bike
    ...
    Location
    NZ
    Posts
    4,205
    Blog Entries
    5
    i didn't have that much patience cheers Swoop

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •