Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 103

Thread: Staggered formation is wrong

  1. #16
    Join Date
    31st August 2004 - 11:05
    Bike
    No bike It solded
    Location
    Ngatea.....Near Thames
    Posts
    290
    Remember ladies and gents, that the 2 sec rule apply s to anything in your lane in front of you...so whether a bike is staggered and to the left of you in your lane you should be two secs from it... so even if he moves into your side of the lane he will still be 2 secs from you...simple eh?!.

  2. #17
    Join Date
    25th April 2006 - 15:56
    Bike
    Gerbil DNA 180
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    277
    I can see how single file is safer, but staggered formation is fine as long as no one tries to pull wheelies or do some similar shit. And it sure as hell looks awe inspiring.
    "People are stupid ... almost anyone will believe almost anything. Because people are stupid, they will believe a lie because they want to believe it's true, or because they are afraid it might be true. People's heads are full of knowledge, facts, and beliefs, and most of it is false, yet they think it all true ... they can only rarely tell the difference between a lie and the truth, and yet they are confident they can, and so all are easier to fool." -- Wizard's First Rule

  3. #18
    Join Date
    19th August 2006 - 09:22
    Bike
    .......
    Location
    Papamoa
    Posts
    274
    To me single file doesn't make sense, always have ridin staggered down straights. usually about 1-2 sec or more from the bike in front of me in my lane for two reasons i can think of right now.

    1. Less chance of debris being flicked up from the bike in front hitting my helmet, headlight, paint, radiator etc
    2. More visibilty.

    The corners are different as I think staying staggered on a corner as a bad idea and should spread out.

  4. #19
    Join Date
    25th June 2003 - 20:28
    Bike
    2001 Yamaha FZ1 2009 Yamaha FZ1-N
    Location
    Raumati Beach
    Posts
    543
    Quote Originally Posted by RT527 View Post
    Remember ladies and gents, that the 2 sec rule apply s to anything in your lane in front of you...so whether a bike is staggered and to the left of you in your lane you should be two secs from it... so even if he moves into your side of the lane he will still be 2 secs from you...simple eh?!.
    Several years ago a group of friends were riding as we tend to do on a 'trip', there were more than 10 of us and we rode in a staggered formation with the recommended gap between "vehicles" of 2 seconds. This was a previously agreed upon riding formation that we have used many times.

    I was riding to the left of the left lane and a wasp entered my full face helmet, as I tend to react severely to their venom I immediately stopped suddenly (emergency braking) and pulled further left. As we were '"touring" this sudden and unexpected action on my part surprised the rider immediately behind me, who was riding to the right of the left lane, who passed me on my right and the person behind them (left/left lane) moved to their right and went past as well.

    As has been stated the 2 sec rule is for the vehicle that is next in the "legal" lane and NOT the said vehicle directly in front of you.

    As you said having a 2 second rule for the second vehicle in front of you is down right stupid and adds risk.

    Mike

    PS Jantar, Blackbird and I rode over 6,000 kms together using the staggered method and neither of us had ridden together before. We survived.

  5. #20
    Join Date
    9th December 2004 - 21:40
    Bike
    1982 kat 1100r
    Location
    ashhurst
    Posts
    238
    I reckon stagggered is the way to go, a problem we used to have with learners back in the day when instructing was the "junction shunt", first bike comes to a junction looks right, if the way is clear pulls out, all good.
    Unless as happened fairly regularly, they stall or wobble etc. Then rider two, if riding in single file, looks to the right, sees way is clear and accelerates straight into the bike of a (now stalled ) rider one!.
    Staggered riding, while not the cure for all ills seems to me to give you the best safety margins.

    My two cents.
    see god then brake... kevin schwantz

  6. #21
    Join Date
    10th November 2007 - 15:25
    Bike
    2013 Victory Judge
    Location
    Zurich
    Posts
    429
    Quote Originally Posted by Grub View Post
    Ahh but there is. Then you have a 4 second buffer. It's more comfortable - and safe.

    Regarding the left hand wheel track, I often use it quite deliberately. Coming up to an intersection with cars waiting or approaching from the left, I move left so I'm not masked or hidden by the car in front of me. I also flick my light onto full beam (if it's not there already)
    Fully behind you Grub. It should stay 2 seconds from anything in front of you, staggered or not. With more bikes around, things can get messy in case of an emergency, so you can't have too many seconds.

    And being in a staggered formation means that you are more visible for the rider ahead, and that you see the rider behind more easily. I also see riders in groups around me as potential hazards, so I keep an eye on them as I do with any other vehicle.

    I'm not very convinced by the staggered position in curves, though. However, if you respect the 2 seconds rule, you won't have any problem if you 'unstagger' for the curve. Experienced riders, what's your view here?

  7. #22
    Join Date
    9th August 2005 - 19:52
    Bike
    CBR450RR
    Location
    Hamilton
    Posts
    6,368
    Blog Entries
    77
    As long as people realise they still require plenty of space around them when riding in staggered formation there's no problem. As long as they maintain good seperation they're able to move around in the lane (for instance when approaching corners, avoiding the wash from trucks etc) as they would when not in a group.

    Even when riding line abreast (appropriate spacing etc) the motorcycle in front blocks the view up ahead so staggered is much better.

    Doesn't matter what formation you use, it's a problem if there isn't enough space to move or see.
    Zen wisdom: No matter what happens, somebody will find a way to take it too seriously. - obviously had KB in mind when he came up with that gem

    Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity

  8. #23
    Join Date
    6th November 2007 - 22:52
    Bike
    GSX650F K9
    Location
    Lower HUtt
    Posts
    764
    Blog Entries
    14
    From a "Learner's" Point of view.

    I have been on a few group rides now. One being almost 1000km's long. All of this ride was done in staggered formation. No problems. 2-4 secs seperation, more at some stages.

    Another one just recently a tip was passed on. Maintain the seperation in staggered formation, and when cornering, move into single file (or ride your line) , then move back into staggered again on the exit of the corner.... If you have enough of a gap to the rider in front, this should not be a problem...

    One thing I have noticed with all the rides so far, and with everyone that I have ridden with so far is that everyone gives everyone else plenty of room.

    Grp riding is something which takes a while to get used to, and for it to be done properly I guess......... (but thats just from my point of view).....

    If your looking at Bike Comms, have a read of this review..

    http://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/sh...ad.php?t=95905


  9. #24
    Join Date
    16th December 2007 - 12:29
    Bike
    2005 Triumph Speed Four
    Location
    Havelock North
    Posts
    1,235
    Nicely put DingoZ.

    I think some on here are missing the point of the 2 second rule. It's designed to provide enough space between you and the vehicle in front such that you can stop without hitting them when the first indication you have of them stopping is their brake lights. That's because in a car the driver's eyes are relatively low and it's often difficult to see what's happening directly in front of the car ahead - hence the need for 2 seconds.

    On a bike if you're following directly behind another rider then I agree that you need 2 seconds. The rider ahead is obscuring your view. If on the other hand you are staggered then you can easily see whatever is in front of the rider one-up on you by looking diagonally across the lane. You will probably see hazards at the same time and begin braking together.

    On a corner everyone falls into single file reducing the spacing to 1 second but now because of the bend in the road you can still see past the rider one-up.

    The important point to note here is that this is group riding - not a fang in and amongst the cages. You're all going to the same place and (probably) travelling at a sensible speed for the conditions. As far as you're concerned the riders in front will behave predictably. Their speed and positioning will also signal hazards even before you've seen them yourself which is very useful.

    Last thing I'll point out is that the further you are from another rider the harder it is to notice subtle changes in closure. Flying in formation glued to the other guy's wing is much easier than doing it at wider spacing. Simple reason is that you notice the changes earlier and therefore the control inputs remain small.
    Manawatu Tag-o-rama Website. Mowgli's score: 38


  10. #25
    Join Date
    2nd March 2004 - 13:00
    Bike
    FransAlp 700
    Location
    Nelson
    Posts
    14,484
    Quote Originally Posted by RT527 View Post
    Remember ladies and gents, that the 2 sec rule apply s to anything in your lane in front of you...so whether a bike is staggered and to the left of you in your lane you should be two secs from it... so even if he moves into your side of the lane he will still be 2 secs from you...simple eh?!.
    + 1

  11. #26
    Join Date
    2nd March 2004 - 13:00
    Bike
    FransAlp 700
    Location
    Nelson
    Posts
    14,484
    Quote Originally Posted by mowgli View Post
    On a corner everyone falls into single file reducing the spacing to 1 second but now because of the bend in the road you can still see past the rider one-up.
    Nope.

    Your reaction time is now halved.
    Sure, you can see up ahead but you only have 1 sec to respond to anything the rider in front of you does.

  12. #27
    Join Date
    16th December 2007 - 12:29
    Bike
    2005 Triumph Speed Four
    Location
    Havelock North
    Posts
    1,235
    Quote Originally Posted by NordieBoy View Post
    Nope.

    Your reaction time is now halved.
    Sure, you can see up ahead but you only have 1 sec to respond to anything the rider in front of you does.
    No. My reaction time is the same. The space between me and the guy ahead has halved.

    Since we're talking about an "organised" group ride there is no reason to expect the rider in front to do anything other than ride with the group. Group riding is not where a few bikers happen to clump together in traffic. In that case you've no idea what the other riders have in mind and I'd advocate the 2s rule all the way.

    As an aside it's interesting to note that in the latest amendment to the rule they've written the minimum following distance into law rather than leave it to common sense. The minimum legal following distance for a vehicle travelling at 90kph is now 36m which equates to about one and a half seconds. Where in hell did they come up with that figure I wonder
    Manawatu Tag-o-rama Website. Mowgli's score: 38


  13. #28
    Join Date
    27th July 2004 - 00:36
    Bike
    NC700X XR250 MTS1200
    Location
    Auckland, NZ
    Posts
    3,275
    Blog Entries
    2
    staggered while on a stright road is fine. But on twisties and bends we tend to change back to single file. More room that way to avoide the potholes and what not on the road
    newbie since August 2004....
    VTR250 (retired) / SV650S (Fw:Keystone19) / GSXR750(given up) / CB400(traded for 919) / CB900 Hornet / CBR954 (traded) / CBR1100XX (sold) / TuonoR (sold) / CB900 Hornet / NC700X / MTS1200 / XR250

  14. #29
    Join Date
    15th September 2005 - 04:40
    Bike
    2007 CB900
    Location
    Naenae here I come
    Posts
    4,170
    Quote Originally Posted by mowgli View Post
    Since we're talking about an "organised" group ride there is no reason to expect the rider in front to do anything other than ride with the group. Group riding is not where a few bikers happen to clump together in traffic. In that case you've no idea what the other riders have in mind and I'd advocate the 2s rule all the way.
    Its not the other riders in the group that you have to worry about .. its the other vehicles on the road ... there is every reason to expect the unexpected .. and that is what you should do not matter who you are riding with.

  15. #30
    Join Date
    20th November 2002 - 11:00
    Bike
    SW-125R(F4-TF125), ZXRD400, RD250LC
    Location
    Wellington, New Zealand,
    Posts
    5,963
    Blog Entries
    36
    Last time I read the Law on this (some time ago) you were not allowed more than four bikes in a group and must be staggered (one second behind the diagonal/two seconds behind the one directly in front).

    I've done many group rides in staggered formation (mostly six or seven bikes) and never had an issue. As long as everyone does the right thing everything would be fine with either formation.

    But single file is a lot of road covered in bikes. A sure way to get split up and riders trying to catch up. That's when you have problems...

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •