Page 7 of 7 FirstFirst ... 567
Results 91 to 93 of 93

Thread: Open-face helmets?

  1. #91
    Join Date
    24th November 2005 - 12:40
    Bike
    anything I can get my grubby wee paws on
    Location
    Outside
    Posts
    1,535
    Quote Originally Posted by NordieBoy View Post
    Yay for twin plug heads :2thumbsup
    Yup - one in each ear :)
    =mjc=
    .

  2. #92
    Join Date
    21st December 2006 - 14:36
    Bike
    Mine
    Location
    Here
    Posts
    3,966
    Quote Originally Posted by Jim2 View Post
    No it doesn't,
    It shows that bad accidents can happen at low speed and an accident can still be minor at high speed.

    Quote Originally Posted by Jim2 View Post
    and an open face helmet would have made no difference in the accident I'm talking about.
    Didn't really mean to hijack the thread but the same principles hold for gear. I wear good gear and think someone not doing so is asking for trouble. However, that is their choice and all power to them. All I'm asking for is the same pragmatism when it comes to a bit of extra speed in the right place and time.

    Quote Originally Posted by Jim2 View Post
    All my response to your subjective point proves is some people are lucky and some aren't.
    Exactly, irrespective of what speed they happen to be doing at the time.

    Quote Originally Posted by Jim2 View Post
    Empirical data tends to be less equivocal and would indicate that risk increases in proportion to the forces involved in an accident. Velocity has a nasty tendency to make force increase dramatically.
    Which will increase your chances of serious injury IF you crash but won't necessarily increase your chances of crashing in the first place. Bear in mind that I'm talking about Judicious use of speed, not the "screw the circumstances I'm going for it" testosterone fuelled mayhem.

    Quote Originally Posted by Jim2 View Post
    Until the "driver training programme sponsored by Labour party voters" is in place and the majority of road users have been through it, the speed limit should be dropped to a blanket 50 km/hr. There will still be people that can't cope with 50 km/hr though.
    If the cavemen took this attitude we'd still be living in caves. Life has risks attached. Note that I mean life, not survival.
    "Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin (1706-90)

    "I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending to much liberty than those attending too small a degree of it." - Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826)

    "Motorcycling is not inherently dangerous. It is, however, EXTREMELY unforgiving of inattention, ignorance, incompetence and stupidity!" - Anonymous

    "Live to Ride, Ride to Live"

  3. #93
    Quote Originally Posted by Jim2 View Post
    Snip'd

    The whole thing needs to start in school.

    Snip'd

    You cannot leave something like this to politicians.
    Hell YES! Bring on drivers ed. classes at high school (It's supposed to prepare the youf of today for life in the real world... - innit?). And not just driving theory, but basic automotive mechanics/engineering - you know, how an engine and gearbox works, how to do an oil and filter change, how to (safely) jack up a car and change a tyre, what a sparkplug is (yes - some people don't know what one is or does), and how to change one.
    They could even get in some basic skid/slide control and braking training on the school rugby fields - (apparently rugby is going out of fashion...) All they'd need was an old banger or two - and some open face helmets, to keep on thread.

    Sadly - the only way that something like this would happen is if the politicians DID get involved.
    UKMC #64

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •