...onya mate - a point well made.
To all those tree hugging, warm fuzzy people out there who fight for whales' right and this right and that right and the other right: go forth and apply as much effort to the issues in yer own backyard (noting that another baby has 'suspicious' injuries today - ie this week's real tragedy http://stuff.co.nz/4473883a11.html). Gangs, meth, drunken yoof, etc.
I have this theory that many protestors are actually in it just for themselves, ie egotistical attention seekers, who haven't got the balls to fight for a 'real' cause, ie one that would require real effort, real thought, real dialogue and real solutions. This profile could be easily applied to many greenies and many labour politicians.
I'm with this guy. He talks muchos sense. There is usually another side to every story...
It's back..."Political Correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical, liberal minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end."
It's back..."Political Correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical, liberal minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end."
It's back..."Political Correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical, liberal minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end."
US American geography....
[YOUTUBE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9kzNWi5h8Hs[/YOUTUBE]
Religion is not the opium of people. Opium is
No it wasn't cut and dried at all.
For example the CIA put the Dalai Lama onto their payroll between the 1950s through to the 1970s, and he arranged funding and support to train Tibetan guerilla soldiers who fought against the Chinese army. This carried on until Nixon came to power and established closer links between the USA and China (at which point the CIA stopped aiding the Tibetans).
Before the Chinese came along, Tibet was a complete shit-hole with most of the land and wealth concentrated in the hands of an aristocratic and cruel ruling class. In my opinion the Chinese have done a huge amount to modernise the country.
So everyone needs to be "modernised" do they?
Ever give some thought to the Abo’s in OZ, They had been getting along just fine for several thousand years, not fucking up the environment, very little in the way of social problems and they would have continued that way for another several thousand years but now they are “modernised” they would have to be one of the most fucked up native people on the planet.
Bring on more “progress” then should we?
What ever happened to leaving people alone to live there own lives without imposing another cultures values on them. Tibet may have been a shit hole by your standards but did they ask for Chinese occupation and modernisation to “improve” their country?
I agree with this statement Mad Max. Development and modernisation boasts a better quality of life and length. However, on the flipside we have more depression in modern society, less community/family bonds and more stress. Add the 'materialism treadmill' of never-achievable-fulfilment through consumtion and the argument to leave the Rainforest people and their habitat alone starts to make a bit of sense.
Consumer boycotts are effective. Look up the Ivg League universities and Pepsi. That movement started with a few students on one campus and quickly spread to several US-based unis. Pepsi eventually responded with a manipulative ownership change structure in Burma that led protesters to believe the company's foreign direct inestment had been withdrawn (when in fact it hadn't). But anyway - power to the people!
Nike corporation also took a beating in its home-town from the local university students a few years back.
I'd be keen to know more about Fonterra's actions abroad where it's been spending up large in South America and China. Unconfirmed reports exist of local farmers being pressured to sell land and of Fonterra-contracted farmers polluting waterways (worse than they do here in NZ) in these countries.
Your view of the traditional Aboriginal way of life is absurdly romantic.
They didn't live in a harsh and unpredictable wilderness because they wanted to - they lived there because they had no other option.
Yes. Providing access to development is a fundamental human rightBring on more “progress” then should we?
Have you considered that people often cannot live by their own hands? The world is filled with failed states ruled by capricious and cruel leaders.What ever happened to leaving people alone to live there own lives without imposing another cultures values on them. Tibet may have been a shit hole by your standards but did they ask for Chinese occupation and modernisation to “improve” their country?
Consider - Afghanistan, North Korea, Burma/Myanmar, Zimbabwe, Ivory Coast, Sudan, Haiti ...
The non-interventionist point of view condemns these people to further suffering.
Hmmm. It's just occured to me to wonder if human rights there are any worse there now than they were when it was a country where serfdom was the norm and slavery was not unknown.
Grow older but never grow up
we need support the chinese government in everthing they do so we can continue to buy cheap goods which allow us to feel rich if 3rd world countrys had decent payrates and working conditions the goods they produced wouldnt be cheap and we would be forced to realise that we are all poor
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks