Daytona Motorsports Group's Roger Edmondson was at the Infineon round of the series last weekend and held an impromptu press meeting in the media center on Sunday. Below are his comments on several subjects.
On an upcoming rules package being released:
"I think that after taking the pulse several times we now have the direction we want to go but we want to try and give some more details. This process of putting a rules package together was never really intended to be public at any part. But events got away from us early on when one of the people we were consulting with went public. So we spent the last six or eight weeks or whatever kind of fighting this battle. Behind the scenes and in public."
"The constituency that hasn't really been consulted has been the promoters. It's one thing for us to have an idea but they still have to buy the product because they provide the theater to put the program on. So now that is the next step but I think that we are real close. I've got Colin and Bill working on the details of the rules. So I have been talking to promoters and talking about possible make up of their weekends."
"I've asked them (Colin Frasier and Bill Syfan) if we can have a set of rules that we can release next week. When I say "a set" it doesn't mean 'what is going to happen if you jump the start'. Technical rules and they might not be 100% detailed but there will be no mistake about the kind of things that we'll allow and won't allow."
"I think that we'll win them over with good competition and the fact that they'll come out here to a good facility and not know who is going to win until the checkered flag comes out. I think that's important. Is it possible that if we changed everything today that Mladin and Spies would win every race? Of course it is. They are two of the best riders in the world, let alone the US. But we won't know until we do this."
What will DMG-style events look like?
"We really want to elevate the look and feel of the weekends. We think it's important that the spectator have a closer connection with the bikes on track. The old 'Win on Sunday sell on Monday' hasn't been as prevalent as it could be, so we want to do a proper introduction of the riders and the teams. We want all the Kawasaki guys together for example and bring the fans out on pit road and let them walk amongst the bikes and the riders before we start the race. When the race is over I don't think we need three motorcycles in victory circle; I think we need three riders and maybe two motorcycles. We need the winning bike and the street version of the same side by side. So the connection between what just won and what you can buy is really unmistakable.
"There's a lot of different things we want to do."
"I like what they're doing right now (outside media center) with the interactive activity with the spectator. It shouldn't be like a play where you sit down at a point and time and watch the show. There should be a lot of things that you can do. So these are the things that we want to talk about."
Edmondson sent out a progress report to all four of the OEMs, but had not received a response from one of them. After saying it wasn't Honda, he declined to say who the OEM is that did not return the questionnaire.
"I think there comes a point in time when you have to figure people aren't interested and you just have to move along. I have done everything that I know to appear and be realistically cooperative. But I am not going to negotiate with myself and I'm not going to waste time with people who have no interest in what we are doing. I've got enough interested people that I need to spend time with trying to make this happen."
"This is not an indictment on anybody. When I was on Wind Tunnel, I said 'silence is acquiescence' so I am just going to assume that they are going to go along with it until I hear otherwise."
Will riders be able to race multiple classes in 2009?
"Both of the classes we assume to be the prime properties will require a Superbike license, so I would say that it is not inconceivable that top riders could enter all three classes on the weekend. But the support programs are really going to be designed for the up and coming rider or for people who are no longer racing full time for income but want to race. Like, we have Springsteen and Filice running in MotoST. MotoST will be at select events. Those are good guys to have. They're Hall of Famers.
I don't think you will have what you have today which is the flow chart that allows each manufacturer to pick their own playground so they figure they can win a championship there and ignore the rest of them."
Edmondson, who has long been a proponent of a spec-motorcycle series, said that it was possible there would be another spec series, in addition to the Red Bull Rookie Cup class.
"There's talk of one manufacturer of having a spec category. I think we need to talk to each promoter and see what they feel is important in their marketplace. But I am not planning any more products from us. I think again that the weekend is two days or maybe two and a half days and we'll see ... I'll give an example just off the top of my head. Some places in the country might like sidecars. I don't think Road ATL will be one of them but if the promoter feels it is and because we will carve out the activity time we need they'll need to take a look at what is important to their spectator audience."
Will promoters be able to add classes to their weekend as they do now, with Road America bringing three-wheeled carssidecars each year?
"When we come in with a Grand Am race we have a pretty standard schedule and then the promoter fills the (rest) of the time with whatever local or any properties he thinks are appropriate. So if we have RB Rookie Cup at select events and we have this new spec program at select events and we have MotoST at select events there will still be time for the promoter to look at other things."
Edmondson says that details of the spec tire series are coming as well.
"Tire program details will be released with the rules package."
"It's important for the tire company gets some idea either how much product they are going to have to give away or how much tire product that they are going to sell. Depending on how the proposals come back. The thing that everybody is automatically assuming about a spec tire program is that one company sells all the tires. Well if that is the case then that company is paying a promotional fee that helps the promoters and the series. The other approach is the NASCAR approach where the tire company comes in and pays a small fee, and provides product to the teams. So we don't know how that is going to manifest itself.
Same deal with fuel but as far as we are concerned we feel fuel is an inexpensive enough product that I'd assume this would be something the team would still buy."
DMG is trying to please several different entities by making fans, teams and sponsors happy. How will it balance out?
"I think we have to start by making ourselves happy by knowing we are going to deliver a product which evolves with its means and can build over a period of time build on things that all those things people are looking for.
Right now, I see people defending the current Superbike program like it's the Holy Bible. I look at a race yesterday that had 21 guys in it, about 12-13 real Superbikes in it. This from a country with 300 million people, I don't find that acceptable. And so while there are those that will vehemently say this is the way that God intended it, there are those of us who disagree just as vehemently. How do you balance that? Fortunately, for me, I am going to do something about it. I am going to try it out my way and see if its any better. It certainly can't be any worse."
On the negative repose to the DMG take-over and Mat Mladin's comments made on Saturday at Infineon:
"I think that the reaction is premature. I don't think anyone is basing their knee-jerk reactions in some instances on anything other than partial information. You've heard me say this: everybody wants improvement, nobody wants change. Any time you make change you are going to get a wide variety of attitudes. I know that there was some concern over Mat's comments yesterday. My response is that all of us from time to time make statements that include an extraordinary amount of arrogance, ignorance and intemperance. But that doesn't mean that they are arrogant, ignorant or intemperate people. It just means that at times emotion gets ahead of where we are. I think Mat had a tough day yesterday. He talked about second-rate rider ... does that mean the guy who finished second? Or does that mean the rest of the Superbike field? Or does that mean what he anticipates the Superbike field next week? I don't know."
"We're reading quite a lot of stuff about an American racing audience who is going through quite a lot of culture shock about this. But we're getting some letters behind the scenes from people who understand exactly where we're headed. And not all of them are Americans. We're getting some stuff from overseas that shows that we're not exactly the laughing stock."
On why 600s will be the premier class:
"I think there are a couple of reasons. One is that the tracks are not getting any safer and the amount of dollars to go to the continued improvements is pretty well dried up unless you get a guy who is just willing to do it, like Don Panoz is willing to do it at Road Atlanta."
"Each manufacturer can logically be expected to want to make next years model more high performance than this year's model. And there is no reason to believe that the creep in performance is not going to continue. When Superbikes went from 1025s to 750s that was the right direction. When they went back up to 1000s some of us believed that it was questionable. We most likely thought that it would go to 600s and we believe that it will everywhere else at some point in time. Even MotoGP slowed down, or at least they thought that they were going to. And I would not be surprised if you see further adjustments."
Will Daytona 600 Superbikes be the premier class, or will Literbikes?
"I think in the minds of the public, that they may think Literbikes are the premier class but in our minds we want to promote the Daytona Superbikes because it's the future. We recognize that you can't really change opinions over night. But I have to think that if we are capable of putting 40-50 Daytona Superbikes on the grid on a regular bases and we end up with several races where we have 5-6 guys racing for the win on the final lap it won't take long for people to understand that is the best racing, and that is really what this is all about. Competition is going to sell tickets, competition is what is going to allow sponsors to come in. People think that we're talking this way just because we're NASCAR. You've got to have sponsors for this thing to grow. And that's not going to happen if people can't win. Right now it's pretty clear that unless you're on one of those two bikes with those two rides, you can't win. Everybody is beating their head against the wall. They may have their day but that's not the basis to sell sponsorship."
On the much rumored manufacturer-led rival series:
"I would expect that would be a concern for them, not for us. We're going to march right down the road with the participants and promoters that want to hold our races. God bless them. This is America and they are free to follow their own vision. I know that a decade ago or fifteen years ago I was told by the Japanese that there was no way that there could be two series. So maybe they just don't want to run a series with me. That's possible. That's fine. God help them. I may be the catalyst for that."
"I asked them to provide four bikes each and it was like I had shot the Pope. So they want to start a series where they provide all the bikes? That's kind of a reversal but that's possible."
How will the hard-core racing fan be converted in this new era of US racing?
"I think that we'll win them over with good competition and the fact that they'll come out here to a good facility and not know who is going to win until the checkered flag comes out. I think that's important. Is it possible that if we changed everything today that Mladin and Spies would win every race? Of course it is. They are two of the best riders in the world, let alone the US. But we won't know until we do this."
"I think that when you look at these fellows like Barry Bonds who have all these home runs but have an asterisks, we don't have asterisks here but maybe if we factored in special equipment and special tires we might. So if we take away some of those special things we'll find out how special the humans are. I don't know that the results won't be the same. But I'd like to know."
Hey Barry, as the 'man on the ground' so to speak:
1) In what direction do you think the premier AMA racing class will go?
2) Where do you think it should go?
Cheers
Bill
It's OK to disagree with me. I can't force you to be right.
Now there's a bloody good point Robert! (As usual)
On paper it seems to be that the ultimate formula for racing is where everything is equal, or almost.
But the result is - it's not! In fact quite the opposite?? (Will NEVER go to an A1 meeting again!!)
That thesis equally applies in the 250cc MotoGP class replacement debate.
Showing my age here! As a very young person at a Levin meeting saw a Cooper Norton battling a Maserati for the win.
Where one had a distinct advantage, the other of course did not. Yet the lap times were identical - so the racing was memorable. (Otherwise I would have forgotten it, eh.)
It's OK to disagree with me. I can't force you to be right.
well news out at moment is they are gonna do a 'litre bike class'
pretty much same rules that in wsbk, so at least the fire breathing 1000cc be still alive and kicking
It's OK to disagree with me. I can't force you to be right.
It's OK to disagree with me. I can't force you to be right.
http://www.superbikeplanet.com/2008/Jul/080703z.htm & http://www.roadracingworld.com/news/...?article=33116
what i don't understand is its coming close to 2009 already and they not got these rules sorted yet, how are half these teams meant to know if they neeed a 600/1000 cc for next year and try and get hold of partsWell-placed sources from within DMG say that late last night a change was made to the format that DMG/AMA races will have in 2009. These sources tell Soup that in addition to the Daytona 600 Superbike class and the American Superbike (formerly Liter Bike) series, DMG will also offer a class called "Factory Superbike."
Sources are telling Soup that "Factory Superbike" class will offer full World Superbike technical rules--and possibly not require spec tires!
Pretty much everyone over here is waiting for the rules package by DMG to come out which should be hopefully by the end of the month. There is alot of people in the paddock I know of from factory riders to crew to the privateer at the back of the field that are waiting for the same thing, DMG to tell us whats happening next year so the manufactures can tell us whats happening next year. Not a scary time, but an unseen future for all at the moment and until DMG releases the rules, everything is just a possibility or a maybe.
Dom
yeah would be hard for people like you Dom in the paddock
you just want to know what next year brings, so you can get down to the business had hand,
It's OK to disagree with me. I can't force you to be right.
yeah i read that earlyer
and read a bunch of interviews with the teams, asking about next year, could be very interesting, espially the rumours of them starting up there own series are still ciculating
Manufacturer Reaction To The 2009 AMA Pro Racing Rules, Class Structure
Part 1: Ducati
Part 2: Yamaha
Part 3: Honda
Part 4: Kawasaki
Part 5: Suzuki
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks