Would you shag someone else's partner?

[ManDownUnder]

B could possibly do that.

Disagreed. If that is the only sex life B has then intimacy between the two rapdily dwindles to a shadow of what it should be.

What if A wanted B to have something a bit more exciting? (i.e. A loved B on a level higher than selfishness)
What if A wanted to watch B having something a bit more exciting? (i.e. A does not fit the social norm)

If the intent of both A and B is to achieve their respective levels of excitement, and both A and B are in natural agreement that it's a good thing (i.e. one does not coerce the other) and both A and B agree either of them can call the new arrangement off if something unforeseen happens that threatens to destroy what exists between them... then...

...go for it...

[jrandom]

Would you bin someone else's bike

Only if they were a bad boyfriend.

[nodrog:Me]

LOL.... no. Assuming I was personally in a position to do so, that would not happen until I understood WHY she wanted it, and determined the implications/fallout of it happening and going wrong.

you sir are to picky. wheres DiscoDan so we can get a desperate mans answer?

[Tank]

B could possibly do that.

What if A wanted B to have something a bit more exciting? (i.e. A loved B on a level higher than selfishness)

What if A wanted to watch B having something a bit more exciting? (i.e. A does not fit the social norm)

Both fall outside the 'bounds' of cheating to which I have commented on already in this thread.

In both the above cases Id say good on em' (both A+B)

or if B just wanted a more exciting wank - he could use sandpaper and cayenne pepper.

[Mikkel]

fuck as usual a simple question is being over analised, lets make it simpler -

the hot MILF from nextdoor comes over and wants you to pound her senseless, you know she is married. do you oblige?

tick a fucken box.

Now THAT would have been a slightly less complicated matter. No attempts at being clever with the formulation of the question nor any poor attempts at establishing a vague hypothetical situation.
In my case - No.
But I have a hot partner and there's no MILF nextdoor so that's easy.

If I was single things might be different... might, but not likely.

Genuine question - can you provide a couple of examples? I'm curious to see which directions you are thinking.

A and B are a couple. Things aren't going too well and both are having second thoughts about their relationship. However, being stuck in the daily routine nothing happens and it's a slow trip downhill.
B goes to a party without A and meets C. B and C communicates well, gets a bit drunk, talks about this and that, dances and are enjoying themselves. At some point B thinks fuck this and starts working C. C is aware of B being in a relationship that isn't working out and that B isn't too happy about it - because B told C about it. C may or may not have an interest in B as a prospective partner. C has to make the choice...


If N enters as a third wheel we get a BNC jack - and if A finds out we might have a BNC terminator... Sorry, couldn't help nerdmode.

[Mikkel]

Those examples have nothing to do with this thread and its poll.

'tain't 'cheating' if the 'other party' gives consent. Duh! Consent means it's all on, baby!

In that case I think we need to change the thread title at least...

But no, I do neither condone nor encourage cheating. Is that clear enough for you?

Disagreed. If that is the only sex life B has then intimacy between the two rapdily dwindles to a shadow of what it should be.

I don't know...

[Dilligaf]

fuck as usual a simple question is being over analised, lets make it simpler -

the hot MILF from nextdoor comes over and wants you to pound her senseless, you know she is married. do you oblige?

tick a fucken box.

teee heee he said anal!!!
you really meant analysed right?

[Mrs Busa Pete]

Couldnt person B just have a good ol wank?

I agree and if B lets A watch they might both get a bit of action.

[jrandom]

In that case I think we need to change the thread title at least...

Pfft, nah. It's snappy and grabs attention - if people don't have the neural capacity to read and properly comprehend the poll question, fuck 'em.

I do neither condone nor encourage cheating.

Well, that's fairly straightforward; where's your issue at, then? The poll question wasn't about kinky multi-partner carryings-on, it was about cheating, pure and simple.

If it's not immediately obvious that multi-partner 'informed consent' situations don't constitute 'cheating', um... no, surely that's pretty obvious?

[007XX]

is that like the Dolmio grin?

Dude, I'm french, not italian, so how the fark would I know?

I know, I have seen the home video...

Bullshit! You been hanging around our window again, haven't you?

fuck as usual a simple question is being over analised, lets make it simpler -

the hot MILF from nextdoor comes over and wants you to pound her senseless, you know she is married. do you oblige?

tick a fucken box.

I'm with ya on that one...simple does as simple is...errr, hang on

[CookMySock]

If N enters as a third wheel we get a BNC jack - and if A finds out we might have a BNC terminator...

BAWWWWWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!



DB

[Mom]

Sorry, couldn't help nerdmode.

My head is spining!

I guess if your blue bits (covering both genders) are so bad you are compelled to do something about it with a non-single person you possibly could be forgiven.... when hell freezes over.

A quick, fast and hopefully satisfying root is good for what ails you sometimes, if we are honest we have all been in that place. To knowingly take advantage of that situation with someone that is not single is not right in my mind.

If you look at bit further afield I am sure you will find a single man or woman that will be a much safer bet for a quickie.

[Mikkel]

I couldn't find the quickie flowchat - but this kinda make sense...

[Mom]

I couldn't find the quickie flowchat - but this kinda make sense...

You are not a PHD student by any chance are you?

[Mikkel]

You are not a PHD student by any chance are you?

Why? Do you wanna play doctor?