It can be a classic because of its design.
It can be a classic because of its age.
It can be a classic because some body loves it.
It can be a classic because of its design.
It can be a classic because of its age.
It can be a classic because some body loves it.
And then one day when it doesn't start, it has Character
. . . but that's a whole new thread.
Don't you look at my accountant.
He's the only one I've got.
Getting back to aruhsv's post, not only is the VF1000F2 not a classic now because it's post 1980, it's also not classic in the sense of being a ground-breaking or revolutionary design. The 'R' model with its gear-driven cams would be a better candidate, or even the VF750s that cleaned up production / superbike racing, especially in the USA.
... and that's what I think.
Or summat.
Or maybe not...
Dunno really....
Classic bike.
Seen more pricks than a second hand dartboard.
Ewww.... Thats one bike I wouldnt test ride!
my gpx 19 years without changing the design, thats gotta make it a classic, right....
Well are mine i have two a 78 suzuki GS550 and a yamahaXS1100 both 30years old
I once owned a Kawasaki GPZ 305.
You would struggle to find one these days. Because they weren't any bloody good.
It's obvious enough that everyone has their own idea on what constitues "Classic".
That's why the classic m/c clubs have age-related criteria, just like the vintage car clubs.
Many in NZ are following the routine of a rolling 25 year machine age qualification
Others, particularly the racing clubs and MNZ (and AMA, PCRA etc) have specific cut-off dates so as to differentiate generations of technology.
PS Yep, the Honda Cub is a classic by any score: it changed the face of motorcycling worldwide, and of transport in Asia. But yet there are people who will argue against this proposition with all their hearts and both neurones of their feeble minds.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks