Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 46 to 56 of 56

Thread: 04 road toll

  1. #46
    Join Date
    9th October 2003 - 11:00
    Bike
    2022 BMW RnineT Pure
    Location
    yes
    Posts
    14,591
    Blog Entries
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by Biff Baff
    Hang on a second - have I missed something here? Being as I've only been in NZ for a few months, are you trying to tell me that the Ministry of Transport were responsible for catching speeding, drunk motorists etc? Did they chase down drivers like the HP today i.e. lights sirens & strange moustaches ?
    Yes, but they had much better 70s Disco style moustaches.
    If a man is alone in the woods and there isn't a woke Hollywood around to call him racist, is he still white?



  2. #47
    Join Date
    27th November 2003 - 12:00
    Bike
    None any more
    Location
    Ngaio, Wellington
    Posts
    13,111
    Quote Originally Posted by Jim2
    Yes, but they had much better 70s Disco style moustaches.
    And decidely more monochromatic.
    "Standing on your mother's corpse you told me that you'd wait forever." [Bryan Adams: Summer of 69]

  3. #48
    Join Date
    10th December 2003 - 13:00
    Bike
    Shanksters Pony
    Location
    NZ
    Posts
    2,647
    Quote Originally Posted by Biff Baff
    Hang on a second - have I missed something here? Being as I've only been in NZ for a few months, are you trying to tell me that the Ministry of Transport were responsible for catching speeding, drunk motorists etc? Did they chase down drivers like the HP today i.e. lights sirens & strange moustaches ?
    Up until 1991 or 1992, (can't remember which) the Ministry of Transport employed traffic officers, whose responsibility it was to police traffic. They did have lights & sirens on pretty black & white cars, some of them did have funny moustaches too. Up until the merger the NZ plolice did not police traffic matters, if they found a drunk driver etc they would call a TO, or sometimes just drive the drunk home and take his keys off him / her.

    John Banks promised NZ 1500 new police officers in his election campaign and once elected he simply took the traffic officers and told them they were now going to be police officers. What we got was a bunch of cops that didn't want to be traffic officers and a bunch of TO's that didn't want to be cops.

    In a nut shell....... obviously it is a great deal more complicated than I have portrayed here.

  4. #49
    Join Date
    8th December 2004 - 11:00
    Bike
    Super Adventure 1290s, Bonnie T214
    Location
    Christchurchish
    Posts
    2,284
    Quote Originally Posted by spudchucka
    Up until 1991 or 1992, (can't remember which) the Ministry of Transport employed traffic officers, whose responsibility it was to police traffic. They did have lights & sirens on pretty black & white cars, some of them did have funny moustaches too. Up until the merger the NZ plolice did not police traffic matters, if they found a drunk driver etc they would call a TO, or sometimes just drive the drunk home and take his keys off him / her.

    John Banks promised NZ 1500 new police officers in his election campaign and once elected he simply took the traffic officers and told them they were now going to be police officers. What we got was a bunch of cops that didn't want to be traffic officers and a bunch of TO's that didn't want to be cops.

    In a nut shell....... obviously it is a great deal more complicated than I have portrayed here.
    Thanks for the history lesson - shit, that sounds like it was a load of bureaucratic bollox back then. A politican that lied in order to get into office - surely not.

    So what's the verdict from a police officers point of view, was it a good or bad move?
    This weeks international insult is in Malayalam:

    Thavalayolee
    You Frog Fucker

  5. #50
    Join Date
    8th November 2004 - 11:00
    Bike
    GSXR 750 the wanton hussy
    Location
    Not in Napier now
    Posts
    12,765
    Quote Originally Posted by spudchucka
    Up until 1991 or 1992, (can't remember which) the Ministry of Transport employed traffic officers, whose responsibility it was to police traffic. They did have lights & sirens on pretty black & white cars, some of them did have funny moustaches too. Up until the merger the NZ plolice did not police traffic matters, if they found a drunk driver etc they would call a TO, or sometimes just drive the drunk home and take his keys off him / her.

    John Banks promised NZ 1500 new police officers in his election campaign and once elected he simply took the traffic officers and told them they were now going to be police officers. What we got was a bunch of cops that didn't want to be traffic officers and a bunch of TO's that didn't want to be cops.

    In a nut shell....... obviously it is a great deal more complicated than I have portrayed here.
    And the rest as they say is history
    Do you realise how many holes there could be if people would just take the time to take the dirt out of them?

  6. #51
    Join Date
    10th December 2003 - 13:00
    Bike
    Shanksters Pony
    Location
    NZ
    Posts
    2,647
    Quote Originally Posted by Biff Baff
    Thanks for the history lesson - shit, that sounds like it was a load of bureaucratic bollox back then. A politican that lied in order to get into office - surely not.

    So what's the verdict from a police officers point of view, was it a good or bad move?
    As I recall it was a re-election promise, Banks was the serving police minister at the time.

    Its difficult to summerise an opinion on an internet forum in few enough words that people will actually bother reading.

    New Zealand was pretty much the only country in the world where the nations police did not police the roads. It makes sense that the police should police the roads as well as criminal matters and in fact the traffic powers are a very strong tool to use against the criminal fraternity. However the traffic side of police work is the the most unpopular with the general public and it would be nice to be able to shake that stigma off.

    The debate seems a little pointless as I simply don't see it ever changing back to how it was. We do have some separation now with highway patrol, strategic traffic units, tactical alcohol groups, CVIU, etc etc. But the public just sees the blue uniform and doesn't differentiate between the cop that gave them a ticket for not stopping at a stop sign and the cop who might be asking for their assistance.

    Overall I would say it was the right move, (but not necessarily a good move) to merge the two groups.

  7. #52
    Join Date
    8th November 2004 - 11:00
    Bike
    GSXR 750 the wanton hussy
    Location
    Not in Napier now
    Posts
    12,765
    Quote Originally Posted by spudchucka
    and it would be nice to be able to shake that stigma off.
    Will never happen Spud
    Do you realise how many holes there could be if people would just take the time to take the dirt out of them?

  8. #53
    Join Date
    8th November 2004 - 11:00
    Bike
    GSXR 750 the wanton hussy
    Location
    Not in Napier now
    Posts
    12,765
    I'm sure it's been said before but as long as the HP is all over like a rash but a burglary victim can't get a housecall from the ThinBlueLine then being more popular........well ask yourself
    Do you realise how many holes there could be if people would just take the time to take the dirt out of them?

  9. #54
    Join Date
    10th December 2003 - 13:00
    Bike
    Shanksters Pony
    Location
    NZ
    Posts
    2,647
    Quote Originally Posted by MSTRS
    I'm sure it's been said before but as long as the HP is all over like a rash but a burglary victim can't get a housecall from the ThinBlueLine then being more popular........well ask yourself
    I'm not disputing with any of that. The current level of road policing does seem to be working, (overall) which should be an indication to the pollies and police admin that more resources poured into general policing would be beneficial. For some reason they don't see it that way??

    Edit: Policing isn't about trying to be popular, many of the things they have to do are inherently unpopular. What the organisation should aim to achieve is the majority of NZ's approving of their actions.

  10. #55
    Join Date
    13th March 2003 - 11:47
    Bike
    2006 Honda XR250L
    Location
    Porirua
    Posts
    7,355
    I liked it after the merger, we could ride our bikes a little bit quick, but safely and nobody bothered us. The general police had far more of my respect than the MOT ever did as they were a bunch of little Hitlers. Then the HP got formed and we have the little Hitlers back. That's how it seems to me.

    Mind you my last two chats with HP have resulted in a reasonable outcome so perhaps I shouldn't complain.
    Cheers

    Merv

  11. #56
    Join Date
    10th December 2003 - 13:00
    Bike
    Shanksters Pony
    Location
    NZ
    Posts
    2,647
    Quote Originally Posted by Blakamin
    Trust me, they are!!!!
    I lived there for 6 years and agree 100%.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •