
Originally Posted by
jrandom
Nuclear reactors create heat, which is used to drive steam turbines. Unlike power plants which drive steam turbines off heat created by burning coal, oil or gas, nuclear reactors can't be easily turned up or down, on or off. They're best just fired up and left to happily fission their way through their fuel, uninterrupted, with any unwanted heat energy thrown away.
Whether this be indeed the case or not, producing excessive power can hardly be considered a problem!
Hell, if you need to direct it somewhere - how about putting in some rather large pumps moving water from the west coast up over the main divide and into the dwindling lakes on the east side to alleviate diminishing lake water levels?

Originally Posted by
ynot slow
Tiwai Pt smelter takes something like 15% of national power?I think was stated on the news.Also when minister David Cunliffe states no power outages this winter,who do you believe?
But Tiwai was the only justification for the Manapouri power station IIRC?

Originally Posted by
Swoop
Yup. Park up a nuke sub and plug it into the power socket.
It also would have the advantage of making tree-hugging greenies have heart attacks!

Just buy the tail of an old Soviet nuclear sub and install the reactor somewhere... Heaps of cheap power for years to come 
Actually we were a few guys from uni who were contemplating this as the base for a self-sufficient commune when we were about to leave university. Combined with some acres of barley, wheat, cannabis and fruit trees we thought we had a pretty good recipe for a never ending party and cheap hobbies (brewing, baking, distilling and mucking around with nuclear reactors... sounds like a decent life to me
)

Originally Posted by
Usarka
Pardon my ignorance Jantar that's interesting - when was the increase to 250 cumecs?
250 is a much nicer number than 100 - 100 is not only smaller it's also rather boring and, frankly, too common 

Originally Posted by
Tank
At the end of the day - being more responsible with electricity (Energy efficient bulbs - turning off lights, wrap on the water cylinder etc) dosnt actually do any harm, and it saves you money.
Some of the power guys here at the electrical engineering department said something along the line that if everybody switched to energy-saving lightbulbs the whole grid was likely to get in trouble - something about the impedance of the fuckers having some sort of periodic time oscillation IIRC...
Not to be an arsehole, but what you call fully insulated houses down here we call cardboard boxes in Scandinavia. Some issues would be alleviated by introducing proper thermally insulating double glazing, rock/glasswool wall insulation and central heating (nuclear power plants are good for this as well I believe). Not just the power crisis - it would also improve general health, the 'nevermind the frost on the duvet, HTFU and wear another sweater' attitude actually doesn't do anything good for you in the long run...
I also believe that I heard somewhere that modern coal power plants are not exactly the polluting pigs they are made out to be...
It is preferential to refrain from the utilisation of grandiose verbiage in the circumstance that your intellectualisation can be expressed using comparatively simplistic lexicological entities. (...such as the word fuck.)
Remember your humanity, and forget the rest. - Joseph Rotblat
Bookmarks