Just kidding. Dig at the banners not the poster.
<img src = "http://homepage.mac.com/david_cohen_design/.Pictures/misc2/tui.jpg">
Imported American Basketball players have been known to shrink 5 inches in the plane.
What teh fuck, who actually cares buys a bike on figures alone?
The bike does look like all the others, and that looks good. How porky it is wouldn't bother me so long as I liked how it rode and went. (Working on the assumption that I had money...which I dont...so why post here...)
Fuck it I'm off..
Your analogies don't make any sense whatsoever. I do have a question for you though...
09 CBR1000 weighs 200kg with 20 litres of fuel
09 GSXR1000 weighs 200kg with 20 litres of fuel
To make their bike lighter than the competition, Suzuki takes 5 litres out of the tank size... Ok, it's lighter now, but are we better off?
Dry weight is always the best way to measure a bike.... strip that bitch right back to the bare minimum... take the air out of the tyres for all I care. At least that's a level playing field (as every manufacturer can take the same steps). In the end, so long as they're all measured in the same fashion (as the Japs all do from what I understand), then they're relative measurements and the actual value is essentially irrelevant.
What if the bike has a 90 litre fuel tank?
You've had too much shiny green bling for now... you'll keep though
/edit: I do find it a bit strange that here's a bike that's disgustingly fast... it'll blow the doors off most comers, and is designed to be a work of art when it's not being ridden... and people are worried about what it weighs??? It weighs enough to do a genuine 300km/hr, that's how much it weighs
Most of the others posting dont have the cash either, so I'll carry on.
It is nothing more, than a marketing tool to publish the figures of the bike. Another tool to get us, (the punters) to ride them. Then we buy whatever we liked the most and got the best deal for.
Argueing the relevence of said figures is futile.
im not talking about fuel, im talking about the shit that wont change, ie batteries, oil capacity etc. if both bikes start dry at the same weight and performance, then one holds an extra 10 kilos of fluids (not including fuel), its pretty obvious which one you would choose if you wanted maximum velocity.
No no, I'm just saying that it's so freakin fast that who gives a crap about a few kgs... As MVNut says, you want a lighter one, sure, they'll hook you up with a lighter one. Try that with your Suzuki dealer
So they fit smaller batteries which makes them less reliable and shorter living. So they use less oil capacity which makes them less reliable and shorter living... etc etc etc... If you use a wet weight, that's what they'll do. Anywhere you've got fluids (cooling, fuel, oil, fork oil) more is almost always better... anywhere you've got oil, a reduction in capacity is a reduction in capacity for cooling/longevity etc.
Dry weight is a far better (for us) way to compare them.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks