
Originally Posted by
disenfranchised
In theory, assuming that the only difference between the fuels is the octane rating (i.e. no extra additives to change how it burns) then 91 should perform exactly the same, for less money [..] Otherwise though, you may as well use the cheapest fuel you can get away with....especially with todays prices.
In theory, yes. I can not tell the difference in performance between the two octane rated fuels, but the high octane definitely covers more kilometers than the low octane. Yeah, don't ask me why, I don't know, but it is bloody clear to me at refill time if someone has put 91 in it - the odo shows 270km and an empty tank, versus 350km for 96 octane. shrug.
I haven't done the maths on which is actually cheapest per km, but I only use high octane fuel because its a pain in the bum losing range.
Steve
"I am a licenced motorcycle instructor, I agree with dangerousbastard, no point in repeating what he said."
"read what Steve says. He's right."
"What Steve said pretty much summed it up."
"I did axactly as you said and it worked...!!"
"Wow, Great advise there DB."
WTB: Hyosung bikes or going or not.
Bookmarks