
Originally Posted by
Cajun
Stig only really drives around the test track, not giving reviews of the car. We all know stig, is also an ex/current f1 driver or simlar, but when testing supercars and comparing them, only people who really really know how to drive can really notice the difference. Just different make up
I kinda disagree with this.
The Stig does the review that a racing driver can do better than Joe Average - namely drive the car to it's limits. The fact that he always does so on a well-known and closed track means that the lap-times are comparable and you can assume that a shorter time equals a faster car.
Every thing else is covered by the other presenters and has more to do with feel and character of the vehicle.
It's no different from bikes in this regard. There are very few riders who are capable of riding a modern sportsbike to the limits of it's capabilities (and those who can probably wouldn't on the public road). Thus, the exact level of performance is quite irrelevant - you choose your bike based on other, less-quantifiable, merits, ultimately on your personal opinion.
It is preferential to refrain from the utilisation of grandiose verbiage in the circumstance that your intellectualisation can be expressed using comparatively simplistic lexicological entities. (...such as the word fuck.)
Remember your humanity, and forget the rest. - Joseph Rotblat
Bookmarks