Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 23 of 23

Thread: “Helmet saved life” of biker who fell four storeys

  1. #16
    Join Date
    11th July 2005 - 00:17
    Bike
    2005 FZS1000 "Tasha"
    Location
    out back in the OutBack
    Posts
    1,570
    ok
    so HE is ok

    but does it say how the bike is?
    ... ...

    Grass wedges its way between the closest blocks of marble and it brings them down. This power of feeble life which can creep in anywhere is greater than that of the mighty behind their cannons....... - Honore de Balzac

  2. #17
    Join Date
    2nd March 2004 - 13:00
    Bike
    FransAlp 700
    Location
    Nelson
    Posts
    14,484
    Quote Originally Posted by FJRider View Post
    but at 180 PLUS...mph.
    The distance to the ground is the same.

    Impact damage is the same - abrasion damage is heaps higher.

  3. #18
    Join Date
    17th July 2003 - 23:37
    Bike
    CB1300
    Location
    Tuakau
    Posts
    4,796
    Quote Originally Posted by NordieBoy View Post
    The distance to the ground is the same.

    Impact damage is the same - abrasion damage is heaps higher.
    Taken from http://www.saskma.com/content/view/20/4/

    Even though many motorcycles were capable of running the quarter-mile in 11 seconds (or less) and topping 140 mph back in '81, not one of the 900-odd accidents investigated in the Hurt study involved a speed over 100 mph. The "one in a thousand" speed seen in the Hurt Report was 86 mph, meaning only one of the accidents seen in the 900-crash study occurred at or above that speed. And the COST 327 study, done recently in the land of the autobahn, contained very few crashes over 120 kph, or 75 mph. The big lesson here is this: It's a mistake to assume that going really fast causes a significant number of accidents just because a motorcycle can go really fast.

    Another eye-opener: In spite of what one might assume, the speed at which an accident starts does not necessarily correlate to the impact the head—or helmet—will have to absorb in a crash. That is, according to the Hurt Report and the similar Thailand study, going faster when you fall off does not typically result in your helmet taking a harder hit.

    How can this be? Because the vast majority of head impacts occur when the rider falls off his bike and simply hits his head on the flat road surface. The biggest impact in a given crash will typically happen on that first contact, and the energy is proportional to the height from which the rider falls—not his forward speed at the time. A big highside may give a rider some extra altitude, but rarely higher than 8 feet. A high-speed crash may involve a lot of sliding along the ground, but this is not particularly challenging to a helmeted head because all modern full-face helmets do an excellent job of protecting you from abrasion.

    In fact, the vast majority of crashed helmets examined in the Hurt Report showed that they had absorbed about the same impact you'd receive if you simply tipped over while standing, like a bowling pin, and hit your head on the pavement. Ninety-plus percent of the head impacts surveyed, in fact, were equal to or less than the force involved in a 7-foot drop. And 99 percent of the impacts were at or below the energy of a 10-foot drop.

  4. #19
    Join Date
    18th July 2007 - 18:32
    Bike
    bike decoration, 02 1150Gs, 2015 Indian
    Location
    wif Mrs Shrek of course
    Posts
    3,205
    Quote Originally Posted by Bob View Post
    Belusca, 28, from Nashua, New Hampshire, was saying goodbye to friends when his bike ‘lurched forwards for no apparent reason’. Belusca was vaulted over the wall of the carpark and fell to the pavement.
    sounds like the computers in bikes are taking over
    Greater love has no one than this, than to lay down one’s life for his friends. (John 15:13)

  5. #20
    Join Date
    8th October 2007 - 14:58
    Bike
    Loud and hoony
    Location
    Now
    Posts
    3,215
    ‘lurched forwards for no apparent reason’ ... tui.

    You gotta hate it when those clutch cables break for no apparent reason and without any warning whatsoever.
    It is preferential to refrain from the utilisation of grandiose verbiage in the circumstance that your intellectualisation can be expressed using comparatively simplistic lexicological entities. (...such as the word fuck.)

    Remember your humanity, and forget the rest. - Joseph Rotblat

  6. #21
    Join Date
    29th March 2006 - 18:06
    Bike
    XJR 1300
    Location
    Hawkes Bay
    Posts
    1,085
    fuck the helmet.! how's the bike......?
    .xjr....."What's with all the lights"..officer..

  7. #22
    Join Date
    26th September 2005 - 14:25
    Bike
    00 Gixxer 750 and ZX10 tricycle
    Location
    Teh Love
    Posts
    2,922
    Quote Originally Posted by avgas View Post
    yep - some need to wear it off the bike
    Lol I know people like that
    Built for speed, not for comfort

  8. #23
    Join Date
    27th January 2005 - 18:09
    Bike
    95 honda cbr900rr 05 zx6rr 89gsxr750
    Location
    papatoetoe
    Posts
    273
    If car drivers wore helmets the road toll would go down . Racing car drivers do and they're all going the same way .

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •