Ah well, at least that's one problem not likely to befall YOU eh?Originally Posted by mikey
![]()
Ah well, at least that's one problem not likely to befall YOU eh?Originally Posted by mikey
![]()
Winding up drongos, foil hat wearers and over sensitive KBers for over 14,000 posts...........![]()
" Life is not a rehearsal, it's as happy or miserable as you want to make it"
Mate - my point is that it's a bit petty policing that type of 'crime' that had no dangerous aspect to it whatsoever (read my earlier post describing the road - other Wgtnonians would back me up on that). Sure she committed this horrendous crime and paid for it but where's the common sense in policing that type of rubbish?Originally Posted by Honda
well at least the last time I looked. It does not make exceptions nor does it get concerned by what "other Wgtnonians would back me up". I am not trying to be rude but accept it and move on, its what most reasonable Kiwis would doOriginally Posted by Velox
![]()
Those who insist on perfect safety, don't have the balls to live in the real world.
I re-read your previous post and started to regret my "sarcastic" response but then I realised you completely contradicted yourself.Originally Posted by spudchucka
followed immediately by....Originally Posted by spudchucka
Look, I understand that laws need to be black and white, but life isn't black and white so we have courts to "hopefully" temper the laws around a given offence (else trials would never consider mitigating facts or carry variable sentences). But when it comes to traffic offences, lets face it, there is no such thing as a fair trial for the motorist. So some may expect that since the police have effectivly been made Judge, Jury, and Executioner it becomes their job to see the shades of grey.Originally Posted by spudchucka
ps your last post came across as very "uncontrolled" (I called myself Clockwork because I thought I was easily wound up)![]()
"There must be a one-to-one correspondence between left and right parentheses, with each left parenthesis to the left of its corresponding right parenthesis."
If all stop signs were used appropriately, I would agree, but my point is that often they are mis-placed (as opposed to misplacedOriginally Posted by marty
) by local authorities. If you then get ticketed for driving "safely" through one you are bound to feel hard done by.
![]()
"There must be a one-to-one correspondence between left and right parentheses, with each left parenthesis to the left of its corresponding right parenthesis."
I have to concur with Clockwork.Originally Posted by Clockwork
I have taken a pragmatic approach to stop signs probably all my life. If I arrive at a stop sign and find that I am able to proceed safely - I do so. If I am unable to proceed safely - I stop.
I do that because it seems to make sense and I am pleased to report that so far no one, including the writer has suffered from a consequence. It just so happens that there has been a law set in place that requires one to stop - no matter what.
But like a lot of other (traffic) laws that 'do not make sense', a plethora of enforcement officers are required to enforce them. Oh well it helps reduce the unemployment stats. And employs people who enjoy their job.
I want to be a copper!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
'Originally Posted by mikey
You wanna grow a brain.
Comin' for a ride tonight, dickhead? Show us old fellas how to ride?
Vote David Bain for MNZ president
BIKE STILL IN TSS BUt should be at roqm if anyone wants to take my head off....
you guys stopping in there?
Allways. Be there from 8:15is I'd imagine.Originally Posted by mikey
Vote David Bain for MNZ president
Noooo. By NOT being one it saves you from grief as per my last posting on this thread, you would be better off as you are - a source of pestilence to some and source of mirth to othersOriginally Posted by mikey
.
Winding up drongos, foil hat wearers and over sensitive KBers for over 14,000 posts...........![]()
" Life is not a rehearsal, it's as happy or miserable as you want to make it"
Taking the piss FFS.Originally Posted by denill
You're upset because you got knocked off the top spot on the bad boys list aren't ya.Originally Posted by mikey
Nope, you still don't get it. What I said was that I give a little discretion at stop signs, thats my choice, however for anyone that gets a ticket for not stopping I'm saying don't whine about it because you know perfectly well what "STOP" means. If you elect to flaut the rule its your choice, if a cop sees you do it he can give you a ticket, or not, thats his choice.Originally Posted by Clockwork
Anyone can defend a traffic ticket in Court, its your choice again so use it if you feel so harshly treated.Originally Posted by Clockwork
Control is not an issue at this keyboard thanks for asking.Originally Posted by Clockwork
THIS THREAD HAS TURNED TO RUCKING SHIT!!!!!!!!!
It was suposed to be about the public image, not some nancy boy complaining about the local ploddy giving them a ticket.
Who ever it was that drove through the stop sign, your whining like a child![]()
You would have known at the time that you was breaking the law, yet you done it anyway. Some people...
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Those who insist on perfect safety, don't have the balls to live in the real world.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks