Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 42 of 42

Thread: HMNZS Canterbury - Another floating bathtub

  1. #31
    Join Date
    19th November 2003 - 18:45
    Bike
    KTM 690 DUKE R
    Location
    Auckland - unavoidably...
    Posts
    6,422
    Quote Originally Posted by jonbuoy View Post
    They got a hell of a lot for the money - 1 x MRV, 2x OPV's, 4 x IPVs for nearly the price of one frigate, and arguably more useful to NZ and the defense forces. The MRV is based on a popular Ferry design and if it was unstable would never have passed class. From what I hear the seatrials on the IPV's went well - its more the classification societies holding up the IPV handovers. You can't expect full mil spec on a civvy budget.
    Frigates doing what they do best!


    http://www.navynews.co.uk/articles/2...1003052201.asp


    Shame aunty helen didn't let us play

  2. #32
    Join Date
    19th September 2006 - 22:02
    Bike
    02 Ducati ST4s
    Location
    Here there everywhere
    Posts
    5,458
    Yes the Navy wanted Canterbury but the specs they asked for and what they got are two totally different things...

    Yeah there will be teething issues.. as with any new design... but over all I reckon it is a still a step in the right direction.

  3. #33
    Join Date
    19th November 2003 - 18:45
    Bike
    KTM 690 DUKE R
    Location
    Auckland - unavoidably...
    Posts
    6,422
    Quote Originally Posted by NighthawkNZ View Post
    Yes the Navy wanted Canterbury but the specs they asked for and what they got are two totally different things...

    Yeah there will be teething issues.. as with any new design... but over all I reckon it is a still a step in the right direction.
    And right now its blocking my view of the city!

    I am just glad we have sky on these tubs these days else it would kill our tv recption as well

  4. #34
    Join Date
    10th December 2005 - 15:33
    Bike
    77' CB750 Cafe Racer, 2009 Z750
    Location
    Majorka'
    Posts
    1,395
    Quote Originally Posted by sAsLEX View Post
    Frigates doing what they do best!


    http://www.navynews.co.uk/articles/2...1003052201.asp


    Shame aunty helen didn't let us play
    You can play with your 50 cals

  5. #35
    Join Date
    19th November 2003 - 18:45
    Bike
    KTM 690 DUKE R
    Location
    Auckland - unavoidably...
    Posts
    6,422
    Quote Originally Posted by jonbuoy View Post
    You can play with your 50 cals
    Anything less than 5 inches is a pistol......

  6. #36
    Join Date
    1st November 2005 - 08:18
    Bike
    F-117.
    Location
    Banana Republic of NZ
    Posts
    7,048
    Quote Originally Posted by sAsLEX View Post
    Frigates doing what they do best!
    Frigging?

    (friggin' 10 chars...)
    TOP QUOTE: “The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people’s money.”

  7. #37
    Join Date
    19th September 2006 - 22:02
    Bike
    02 Ducati ST4s
    Location
    Here there everywhere
    Posts
    5,458
    Quote Originally Posted by jonbuoy View Post
    You can play with your 50 cals
    Many eons ago I had a play with the .50 cal which was weird I was RP... but aboard HMNZS Pukaki the last tour of the Lake Class PC...

    Ok I'm showing my age now

  8. #38
    Join Date
    28th January 2008 - 14:23
    Bike
    2006 Triumph Bonneville T100, RSV Mille
    Location
    The BOP
    Posts
    178
    Quote Originally Posted by NighthawkNZ View Post
    Many eons ago I had a play with the .50 cal which was weird I was RP... but aboard HMNZS Pukaki the last tour of the Lake Class PC...

    Ok I'm showing my age now
    Yeah, we used to save our training ammunition up on HMNZS Taupo, and have a mega shoot for the day. everyone got 200 rounds on the .50 cal, and 400 rounds on the 5.56 mm Minimi Light Machine Gun.

    We would make up targets out of empty 20 litre drums tied together in groups of 4.

    Great days.

  9. #39
    Join Date
    19th November 2003 - 18:45
    Bike
    KTM 690 DUKE R
    Location
    Auckland - unavoidably...
    Posts
    6,422
    Quote Originally Posted by Hitcher View Post
    Don't just blame the Gummint. The Canterbury was the Navy's preferred option.
    Oh and I would like to point out that it is not the Navy or the Defence force that deals with major acquisitions it is the Ministry of Defence.

    Quote Originally Posted by KiwiRat View Post

    We would make up targets out of empty 20 litre drums tied together in groups of 4.

    .
    What no killer tomatoes?
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_3068.jpg 
Views:	6 
Size:	83.0 KB 
ID:	105510  

  10. #40
    Join Date
    27th November 2003 - 12:00
    Bike
    None any more
    Location
    Ngaio, Wellington
    Posts
    13,111
    Quote Originally Posted by sAsLEX View Post
    Oh and I would like to point out that it is not the Navy or the Defence force that deals with major acquisitions it is the Ministry of Defence.
    The Canterbury was the Navy's preferred option. In this case the Navy got what the Navy wanted.
    "Standing on your mother's corpse you told me that you'd wait forever." [Bryan Adams: Summer of 69]

  11. #41
    Join Date
    19th September 2006 - 22:02
    Bike
    02 Ducati ST4s
    Location
    Here there everywhere
    Posts
    5,458
    Quote Originally Posted by Hitcher View Post
    The Canterbury was the Navy's preferred option. In this case the Navy got what the Navy wanted.
    Actually no they didn't get what they wanted,... the specs they asked for are not what they got...

    and as I said before there will be teething issues with any new design

  12. #42
    Join Date
    19th September 2006 - 22:02
    Bike
    02 Ducati ST4s
    Location
    Here there everywhere
    Posts
    5,458
    Quote Originally Posted by Swoop View Post
    Thank goodness it isn't.
    That ship was designed for the North Sea. There are considerable differences in wavelengths and sea conditions encountered between there and the Pacific. The same mistake was made with the Lake Class patrolboats. The navy had the option of a slightly longer version but made the wrong decision on that deal also.
    The Navy does not make any final decision... the Lake class Patrol boats were cut back from the orginal size because the didn't think they would be able to ship the over... Muldon gubberbent then made the cut backs not the navy or even the MoD
    and yes they were bad in rough seas... I nearly broke my leg being thrown out of my pit once...

    Quote Originally Posted by Swoop View Post
    Upham was also too light. Remember that it was designed to carry large amounts of freight and traffic across the channel to European ports. As such, it rolled like crazy and had to have shipping containers filled with weight, placed inside to attempt an "easy fix".
    Any ship that is designed to carry cargo has the same issues... even many of the larger carriers, LHD's and even LSD's if the are lightly loaded they will role... to make it worse the carries are also flat bottoms...

    Quote Originally Posted by Swoop View Post
    The "new" Canterbury is a great concept. Multi-role with an emphasis on disaster support.
    Let's hope that the designers have learned from errors of the past... (Tui, anyone?)
    She has had teething issues but most of the remedies have now been completed and now starting to show her worth. I believe she is of to RIMPAC 2014
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	912270.jpg 
Views:	19 
Size:	43.0 KB 
ID:	296730  

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •