
Originally Posted by
Trudes
Just out of interest, what would the general ratio of L platers to experienced mentor type riders on TCWNR be? Does there need to be some more "seniors" turning up? Or are there generally not that many newer riders coming?
I would hate to see this ride disappear completely because of some moaning and wingeing on here about a few minor accidents, that we all know that even the carefullest of us can still have.
It's been a while since I've been able to come along to a TCWNR, so can't comment on people's riding on the ride or anyone's attitude or the organisation etc, but like all things, it seems to have progressed and changed by the sounds of things.
Maybe some of the people that are concerned about this ride should turn up to a few Wednesdays and offer some words of wisdom, offer to be TEC etc and get this ride back on track if you think it's fallen off, before more people do.
Damn fine post m’dear.
Numbers vary a lot, largest variable being the weather. I’ve attended irregularly for the last couple of years, and in passing I’d say there’s been little change in how the ride is managed. I do, however, see a trend towards more L platers, a consistent cadre of intermediates and progressively less and less seniors.
That is a problem, it’s already been noted that the few bins there’s been have been novices, predominantly at speeds that can only be seen as almost pedestrian. I have been on a couple of Wed rides where the speeds were inappropriate for L platers, but that was ‘cause there wasn’t any there.
I don’t consider myself a senior. My contributions, such as they are, have been limited to simple advice to whatever novices wish to chat about the ride at the pub. I think I’ve scored a few hits there, but I simply don’t have the depth of road experience to be advising any but the most inexperienced. We need more seniors, particularly those with some ability or experience in teaching/training, (another skill I lack).
Never met Bruce, so I’ve no idea what his ambitions for the ride were. I know several who benefited from his methods, and I’d like to know more about how he structured the learning aspect of the ride. Lets hear a bit more about how the ride should be structured and less about how it shouldn’t eh? I believe I’d rather hear that from those who’re prepared to help implement any eventual consensus, though.
It may very well be that there’s a need to split the event into separate functions, (it’s worked OK recently, and before), particularly if there’s seen to be a need for actual “organised” mentoring in smaller groups, although I’d personally prefer the same destination to be retained. To those who care enough to post here: Piss, or get off the pot. Sels is one of the only genuine senior to regularly turn up, and I believe his contribution and those of the few others that do turn up when they can is both valuable and worthy of recognition.
Lets hear some simple, constructive suggestions, eh?
Oh, and if I hear "there's no such thing as an accident" once more time this year I'm going to get pissed.
Go soothingly on the grease mud, as there lurks the skid demon
Bookmarks