I understand it perfectly well. If you remove any kind of "cost" against a resource, you need some person to decide where to allocate it. Recipe. For. Disaster.
Isn't it obvious? How many people might like to vote Social Credit, but are scared of National so vote Labour as the best anti-Nat vote? Look at the other direction, I know plenty of people that didn't vote ACT because a Nat vote was the best guarantee against Labour/Green/Dotcon fuckup.So you've asked them all? You reckon that the majority vote negatively? I don't. The system of voting is going to change what exactly? It's a facade.
Bookmarks